Re: [openpgp] Inconsistent styling of "direct key signature"

Heiko Schäfer <heiko.schaefer@posteo.de> Thu, 12 October 2023 12:24 UTC

Return-Path: <heiko.schaefer@posteo.de>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69596C14F736 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 05:24:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=posteo.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XdZXTkwulrXg for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 05:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout01.posteo.de (mout01.posteo.de [185.67.36.65]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F894C15108E for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 05:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A37B9240027 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 14:24:03 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1697113443; bh=/7+UVkhQrCVwl45K5/5HQn1CshMUw8/Z99WnGPCcM70=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:To:Cc:From:Subject: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=I1keMwatWfndeDPbd4goNztqz8sTVS6KLXb7TnBjl5lzPXIRUC/Yc1leBwS7eJRL0 dDGlIoaJ5gJWAsbP+6fbfwmUNKOa6VE++ACrwPlt1vdI2E1hI9pF5OlUDESqS0UWIa +eavwUIpouf/DKQ2sA6HbkRhNswG1G5Ufv7C2BoiuIosmEkytAt1lSfjAWcT+uGbjb IoVdWO/YLJt8fTpun9Fpze6BFQpxwq8M0GWzeWXqJA+nUThBMsbWWtTdhK2QuMdN0Q +TC39xnZQFRUrNFoHXgX2MbHFns/a65ChgjDlnwN+80XlGGLTEr30K3/n5zP6XxWKN b7EZFokdJvpow==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4S5phz18h1z6tvc; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 14:24:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from services.foundation.hs (services.foundation.hs [192.168.21.4]) by mail.foundation.hs (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB7BA705C5; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 14:24:02 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <80185442-3888-21e1-38d2-7cc1fe2bed92@posteo.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 12:24:01 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Cc: IETF OpenPGP WG <openpgp@ietf.org>
References: <a101056d-cc9f-2665-930f-f973078a9d9e@posteo.de> <a7d28955-60b1-893d-03e3-1330e89aa526@nohats.ca>
From: Heiko Schäfer <heiko.schaefer@posteo.de>
In-Reply-To: <a7d28955-60b1-893d-03e3-1330e89aa526@nohats.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/17Hm2udrIR1qXnKDyS7BtcPGBSU>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Inconsistent styling of "direct key signature"
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 12:24:16 -0000

> I think I addressed (some?) of this using: 
> https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/rfc4880bis/-/merge_requests/352
>
> Please give feedback.

I made some additional changes that I believe clean up the DKS styling, 
and pushed the result as !353