Re: [openpgp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-00.txt

Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com> Fri, 05 February 2021 21:18 UTC

Return-Path: <derek@ihtfp.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28A73A0B02 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 13:18:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ihtfp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T0-ivRoDbArn for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 13:17:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org (MAIL2.IHTFP.ORG [204.107.200.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C1E43A0B01 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 13:17:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79B3E2040; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:17:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.ihtfp.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16756-07; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:17:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id ACED7E2046; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:17:56 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ihtfp.com; s=default; t=1612559876; bh=eXgu9E7hlqpWZasdwhiTx4ni1phoJSIbv7MBdBOupQo=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Date:Subject:From:To:Cc; b=lKFsoJE/bj4T+5sorOlIwg2aO85/g4+cFOOg/IkCFPBzTjTwWh1dc2HBugeOB3Hz8 6ZkfCPsWamwYrE6L8vgKxIYY2XD9RYxgxV0HUlNQwTySPBNIRLozdahQacVFOaMZll AaQpYaDzTcOwab69uN2ByiOktLv1/0g1v8wiZ9IQ=
Received: from 192.168.248.239 (SquirrelMail authenticated user warlord) by mail2.ihtfp.org with HTTP; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:17:56 -0500
Message-ID: <daab2679d46a829f5af1b77e211c7a5a.squirrel@mail2.ihtfp.org>
In-Reply-To: <24870.1612559269@localhost>
References: <161193808437.14457.1252111225434038573@ietfa.amsl.com> <629addad-3dc3-a490-46db-5fafab95c7d5@nohats.ca> <87o8h7cgrq.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <24870.1612559269@localhost>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:17:56 -0500
From: "Derek Atkins" <derek@ihtfp.com>
To: "Michael Richardson" <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: "Daniel Kahn Gillmor" <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>, "Paul Wouters" <paul@nohats.ca>, openpgp@ietf.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22-14.fc20
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.2a
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/1b_fJlpHpioO1YOJnCyx2kayyIM>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-00.txt
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 21:18:01 -0000

On Fri, February 5, 2021 4:07 pm, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
>     > On Fri 2021-01-29 11:59:31 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
>     >> The -00 document is just the re-generated version of RFC4880. The
> only
>     >> changes are the updated boilerplate and generating code differences
> of
>     >> the xml tools over the years, as well as the document author, role
> and
>     >> name/time of the draft.
>
>     > Thanks for this, Paul!
>
>     >> You can see the diff with RFC4880 using this url:
>     >>
>     >> https://tools.ietf.org//rfcdiff?url1=https://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4880.txt&url2=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-00.txt
>
> Looks good to me.
> Some significant pagination differences later on, but the text all looks
> consistent.

Ditto.  The ToC doesn't include anything beyond x.y.z, and there is some
differences in text wrapping and pagination, but I don't see any content
differences.

>     > I've proposed some document editing workflow clarifications over on
>     > https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/rfc4880bis/-/merge_requests/31,
> including
>     > an ephemeral section (to be removed when we make it to an RFC) that
>     > describes how to collaborate on the document.
>
> Good.

I have no objection to this merge.

-derek

-- 
       Derek Atkins                 617-623-3745
       derek@ihtfp.com             www.ihtfp.com
       Computer and Internet Security Consultant