Re: Comments on ECC draft
Bodo Moeller <moeller@cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> Tue, 24 September 2002 07:42 UTC
Received: from above.proper.com (mail.proper.com [208.184.76.45]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA19128 for <openpgp-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 03:42:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) id g8O7bGS12987 for ietf-openpgp-bks; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 00:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cdc-info.cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de (cdc-info.cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de [130.83.23.100]) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g8O7bFv12981 for <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 00:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cdc-ws13.cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de (cdc-ws13 [130.83.23.73]) by cdc-info.cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9362C8E; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 09:37:13 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from moeller@localhost) by cdc-ws13.cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) id g8O7bCM03590; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 09:37:12 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 09:37:12 +0200
From: Bodo Moeller <moeller@cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>
To: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Cc: hal@finney.org, rabbi@abditum.com, Dominikus.Scherkl@biodata.com, ietf-openpgp@imc.org
Subject: Re: Comments on ECC draft
Message-ID: <20020924093712.B3563@cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>
References: <200209240702.TAA39132@ruru.cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200209240702.TAA39132@ruru.cs.auckland.ac.nz>; from pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz on Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 07:02:44PM +1200
Sender: owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openpgp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <ietf-openpgp.imc.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 07:02:44PM +1200, Peter Gutmann wrote: > Len Sassaman <rabbi@abditum.com> writes: >> OpenSSL now has ECC in it > That's not certain yet, the licensing terms are such that it can't be used > under the OpenSSL license unless Sun re-release it unencumbered. Sun has nothing to do with the OpenSSL ECC implementation for GF(p). ECC over GF(2^m) is due to Sun and is specifically "licensed pursuant to the OpenSSL open source license". There's an additional covenant regarding patents, but nothing patent-encumbered should be enabled in the default configuration (if you want GF(2^m) ECC to be faster, you can set a compiler switch; in this case you have to accept the Sun covenant). -- Bodo Möller <moeller@cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> PGP http://www.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/TI/Mitarbeiter/moeller/0x36d2c658.html * TU Darmstadt, Theoretische Informatik, Alexanderstr. 10, D-64283 Darmstadt * Tel. +49-6151-16-6628, Fax +49-6151-16-6036
- Comments on ECC draft hal
- RE: Comments on ECC draft Dominikus Scherkl
- Re: Comments on ECC draft Bodo Moeller
- RE: Comments on ECC draft Jivsov, Andrey
- Re: Comments on ECC draft Bodo Moeller
- Re: Comments on ECC draft David Hopwood
- Re: Comments on ECC draft Len Sassaman
- Re: Comments on ECC draft David Shaw
- Re: Comments on ECC draft Peter Gutmann
- Re: Comments on ECC draft Bodo Moeller
- RE: Comments on ECC draft Dominikus Scherkl
- Re: Comments on ECC draft Dominikus Scherkl
- Why ECC? Rodney Thayer
- Re: Why ECC? Hironobu SUZUKI
- RE: Comments on ECC draft Dominikus Scherkl