Re: [openpgp] [eX-bulk] : Re: chairs for chartering process

["Christopher LILJENSTOLPE" <[e-mail]>]

Greetings Ben,

	Comments in line....

On 2 May 2015, at 2:56, Ben McGinnes wrote:

> On 2/05/2015 6:43 am, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE wrote:
>> Greetings, and thank's Stephen (I think) for the opportunity
>>
>>  Daniel and I have been talking a bit about the working group, and a
>> charter.  We'd like to put some of those ideas to the list for
>> discussion.  Ideally, it would be good if we could have some consensus
>> about a charter within the next week or two to start the formation process.
>>
>> We would like to scope this WG fairly tightly, therefore:
>>
>> 1) The primary charter goal would be create a RFC4880bis document.
>> a) At the end of that process, we would either re-charter, or close.
>> b) Other documents (informational or bcp) MAY be entertained by the
>> WG, but are not required for the WG to complete it's task, nor    will
>> their progress "keep the WG from closing"
>
> Sounds good and it's not like any extraneous docs can't be rolled into
> some other proposal if needed, maybe even stand alone informational
> RFCs.


That's our thoughts.


>
>> 2) We will require at least two independent reviews (from within the WG)
>> of an individual submission before a document is considered a candidate
>> for WG acceptance.  The chairs will help chide reviewers, but we want to
>> see interest in the WG in a document before it progresses.
>
> Also fine.


Thx


>
>> 3) We are going to try and run this group virtually as much as possible
>> (i.e. we will only physically meet if necessary).
>
> Excellent, I know I've said before that operating online as much as
> possible is my preference.  Flying to the USA or Europe right now is
> completely out of the question in my case.
>
> That said, depending on the nature of any physical meeting, providing
> a means of participation for those of us a little farther afield would
> be good.  PPAU does this every year for our congresses so it's
> feasible, usually with a designated person to monitor an IRC channel
> for responses and video or audio streaming via whatever method is most
> appropriate (for audio a Mumble server will do in a pinch).


I've been at the end of an IRC/Jabber room trying to get attention for meetings I can't attend, so I have felt that frustration.  When I chair, I TRY and have on of the chairs watching the room(s), as well as the scribe.   It doesn't always work, but we will try to make it as easy as possible.

	Christopher



>
>>  What do you all think about these as chartering concepts?
>
> Sounds like a good plan.
>
>
> Regards,
> Ben
>
> _______________________________________________
> openpgp mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp


--
李柯睿
Avt tace, avt loqvere meliora silentio
Check my PGP key here: http://www.asgaard.org/cdl/cdl.asc
Current vCard here: http://www.asgaard.org/cdl/cdl.vcf