Re: [openpgp] Stateless OpenPGP command line interface proposal

iang <iang@iang.org> Mon, 02 December 2019 21:58 UTC

Return-Path: <iang@iang.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB8E12008C for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 13:58:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Km0kknhyXn9u for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 13:58:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from virulha.pair.com (virulha.pair.com [209.68.5.166]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 014FA12008B for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 13:58:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from virulha.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by virulha.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BF86D5DE; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 16:58:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from plata.local (iang.org [209.197.106.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by virulha.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47FC66D5D7; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 16:58:26 -0500 (EST)
To: openpgp@ietf.org
References: <87ftjck4fc.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <20191028204032.bubbzueti2ebpobm@LykOS.localdomain>
From: iang <iang@iang.org>
Message-ID: <81f3d7c7-f19d-38ca-923d-8a828779d9dc@iang.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 23:58:25 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20191028204032.bubbzueti2ebpobm@LykOS.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/2FpZcMUks_ERyAVVQMuHsW6vXSI>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Stateless OpenPGP command line interface proposal
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 21:58:29 -0000

On 28/10/2019 22:40, Santiago Torres-Arias wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 04:20:39PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> Hi OpenPGP folks--
>>
>> The recently-announced OpenPGP test suite [0] inspired me to try
>> drafting a spec for a purely-functional, stateless OpenPGP command line
>> interface.  The idea is that different implementers could provide the
>> same interface, focusing specifically on the object security aspect of
>> OpenPGP (leaving aside identity management).
>> ...
> I think this is a *phenomenal* idea. I wonder if this could mature in a
> well-defined API that e.g., gpgme could adopt?


Concur!


iang