IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] Stop dragging around old material, please!

Rick van Rein <rick@openfortress.nl> Thu, 17 November 2022 02:09 UTC

Return-Path: <vanrein@vanrein.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52193C14F726 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 18:09:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.16
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.16 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FAKE_REPLY_C=1.486, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kpnmail.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pPSny5oRzioT for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 18:09:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ewsoutbound.kpnmail.nl (ewsoutbound.kpnmail.nl [195.121.94.169]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8E0CC14F725 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 18:09:07 -0800 (PST)
X-KPN-MessageId: cf7fd782-661c-11ed-823a-005056abad63
Received: from smtp.kpnmail.nl (unknown [10.31.155.39]) by ewsoutbound.so.kpn.org (Halon) with ESMTPS id cf7fd782-661c-11ed-823a-005056abad63; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 03:09:04 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kpnmail.nl; s=kpnmail01; h=content-type:mime-version:message-id:subject:to:from:date; bh=w6hEDnEgKHx80KUkMtAtuZKpZa3WRhU7ho/cEgX1q0s=; b=eUr1eYvngvDo+xPN/XQrR1fEIAETlVTXTLwgm77o4XTLUVrjim+8r6P7dNvAbHL/eFQrJpKEiSonA lbdno+W52ZTc6Xb6Ipidba2otNvqEOQRZZCmfcnj3iWdpUSvgjYi2Gqmaivr+kHdSXEbYHRXa0ofl9 agNuewOO2eTTj9sI=
X-KPN-MID: 33|vVXo3N72Xp6ZSZaLwGIRgwaLz86qseAY0i4TNr0eSLhIq5GY51na3bKjqyaYir/ 5j5+7ilxnvV0o7E34PhJRKZnnyDKfoKnYRvVJccPHmWU=
X-KPN-VerifiedSender: No
X-CMASSUN: 33|PnKqT0FgugV31kXGCgAjS1lH8dZDAETsnRSid5EikPvFVHF5cLT1oeYl7KA4As6 69MD4LveGNcMstTSoPiB0Lg==
X-Originating-IP: 77.173.183.203
Received: from fame.vanrein.org (77-173-183-203.fixed.kpn.net [77.173.183.203]) by smtp.xs4all.nl (Halon) with ESMTPSA id cfac6508-661c-11ed-b8b1-005056ab7447; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 03:09:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: by fame.vanrein.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9D2262C3D2; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 02:09:04 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 02:09:04 +0000
From: Rick van Rein <rick@openfortress.nl>
To: openpgp@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20221117020904.GA11610@openfortress.nl>
Mail-Followup-To: openpgp@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <-UrVKG-yXwxL9OXELbi6rHPHpZcYy7cj0MgpmI8kmLzIHTIsXRrWjYSRKjLRNNV77DTYief7ETN7frOJDj5acS_d2eAN-glrPP3jWqWccaQ=@protonmail.com> <wWMnF3c6WOMjMUUUZucrAgfLyI_UyKedm_IN0UTWIfwCHbbMEbfMxojua406OjBQVJYuD9WL01RwnQbqbavko615ogOy_JfgAmeZpbZAtIQ=@wussler.it>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/2afzKYKlgtjy1oFBSA7uOg6MgFk>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Stop dragging around old material, please!
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 02:09:25 -0000

Hello OpenPGP,

The responses I got represent a clear view on how specifications
should be written.  It happens to not be mine and if I reviewed as
offered during #115 this would trigger a strong debate.  Such a
debate might interfere with progress.

Rather than doing this review, it is more constructive if I quietly
let this work continue without my input.  I will remove myself from
the group and its related voting rights.

Good luck,
 -Rick

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status