Re: [openpgp] Expiration impending: <draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc4880bis-01.txt>

Heiko Stamer <HeikoStamer@gmx.net> Mon, 03 July 2017 19:25 UTC

Return-Path: <HeikoStamer@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD95131738 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 12:25:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GdUcp0IyNaw0 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 12:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCC1E12ECC1 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 12:25:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] ([78.52.158.107]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LoE4f-1dup5b3t3R-00gGuC for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 21:25:35 +0200
To: openpgp@ietf.org
References: <149847732613.7086.8580563657011849337.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJKxWevOZYv1hOBFV-+3T=2x43vmie50t6ko2A+a-gTS_A@mail.gmail.com> <a3a82aab-a0d9-f044-21c0-26de346bf6b3@sixdemonbag.org> <20170702232541.t25v6mf36qnrxkex@genre.crustytoothpaste.net>
From: Heiko Stamer <HeikoStamer@gmx.net>
Message-ID: <1b5da7bf-d43b-fde5-f6b6-28d9c6fd6edb@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 21:26:24 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170702232541.t25v6mf36qnrxkex@genre.crustytoothpaste.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:YHSvRaONmDuk7/mq5jhTYOBHrksf2S3in+X+6JvjP7EJbIhw5pF UD/rj5odDGZ221oP7W/CznyhH+Tq05Yvbe9Jf+dHmF2n2zMue29uq45cNN4TcGrgf0Yp7// CUIW+L5iuwActGtEIR3/jiwEwVwI7tSy2mrjsmFHFWyiLOM62yUMohHqpq6RNbGUJKVJ8yK ih4pTn/p5BWh1wDNpIfrw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:WZu78HIpnGM=:BKZjsuZKNNG3XtWauF/+Hx lmc9byOk768aixHgVzI64Jeuesa53IK1nJYiimCttLbGW3pLlFVvONLDMPvHlV4i82a+ZmBku 2nknTOun5YyfG2cc54lbTJLqgLUYUJzaFlf4LzgOWx8qWbVmLTdwGl6gOTEmcC06+WULgtyFK zQLK4yrieR3knTF5HMB++DYOHUjbPnTGo6WeBDwJJ6rZZ1t4TfGDgqZTy6QAEJ+wSiPi7w8Sc cNvqfJNO7fCo2dHYzuniTS5hYZaefQ/A39SVOFvoa5UI3vB3rSWn2tyPC783eMgqFoUA8WlRQ VxbEsauzDGAMve4DU6V9rtF9xZk73NPNhDIUihR/9aNeg3/w4uXOM8pcn+92Prkn9mw/6B8Di VX2z0Jg4p2bDYjs8LX7gE2bty+aM747Lj4yQyZjqnq4VhuN7bi6zfBYcxndOE0IlLONwr00I9 4n9KnTCDJrMNZ9iG2tX4bGqvMoDjrbMym+4LqEeFFL7YOFBDZIaWGf66xcDkcSSftlqXGW0X6 J6MlR9uZCtviRSnCaLp+Ge8N1wm0Ek4yYSPEEsYfBofjcoqXZPwwbkbKQbzbXZV7rtTT5UOOT sDzJNnEri9lAkz6SujIDzr/qbQDW/bKSsqkD1hG98qrtatw5T37RiGilE0pI2+W+gH2soHupv pe8uBqYIbC9VYEU2ftbdf0uQrYWtjrWIrdWaDXGRW7VLuS6/uxV4mEfmdCu3e7r8LEoCvKKVD W1od85+NqCXqBCba7NysnlSP0C77vdG0VLj0cI17xNshdhfCt9A9E6kwipzD0s+mnTUqHBaqq l0ZQeQA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/31abtqqClU96T5qcx_iU77rR2dQ>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Expiration impending: <draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc4880bis-01.txt>
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 19:25:39 -0000

Hey,

first of all, I am new to this mailing list. So please forgive me,
if I comment on things that have been already discussed before.

brian m. carlson wrote:

> However, I think the WG as a whole needs to provide more input

What's your opinion about defining additional (non-ECC) public-key
algorithms, e.g., Cramer-Shoup or an IND-CPA secure variant of ElGamal?

Best regards,
Heiko Stamer.