Re: [openpgp] Linked Identities / URI Attributes status
Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> Fri, 06 October 2017 10:48 UTC
Return-Path: <wk@gnupg.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29B0134905 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 03:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iJdP8AY54v2g for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 03:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kerckhoffs.g10code.com (kerckhoffs.g10code.com [IPv6:2001:aa8:fff1:100::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DE66134904 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 03:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uucp by kerckhoffs.g10code.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.89 #1 (Debian)) id 1e0QBI-0001ub-PK for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 12:48:36 +0200
Received: from wk by wheatstone.g10code.de with local (Exim 4.84 #3 (Debian)) id 1e0Q4J-0002XF-If; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 12:41:23 +0200
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
To: Wiktor Kwapisiewicz <wiktor@metacode.biz>
Cc: openpgp@ietf.org
References: <43412d30-51a2-1941-43d9-f0207f77afcd@metacode.biz>
Organisation: The GnuPG Project
X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text.
Mail-Followup-To: Wiktor Kwapisiewicz <wiktor@metacode.biz>, openpgp@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 12:41:17 +0200
In-Reply-To: <43412d30-51a2-1941-43d9-f0207f77afcd@metacode.biz> (Wiktor Kwapisiewicz's message of "Fri, 6 Oct 2017 11:11:34 +0200")
Message-ID: <874lrctv76.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=bluebird_Albanian_freedom_Semtex_War_on_Terrorism_Glock_BCCI_anthrax"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/36zgFe7WKnheRySJSJin3pcB3y0>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Linked Identities / URI Attributes status
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 10:48:40 -0000
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 11:11, wiktor@metacode.biz said: > Is there anything that blocks URI Attributes [1] from being approved and > having an official (2-99) User Attribute type? I was not aware of that (expired) I-D. Anyway, I think that the User Attributes should not be extended over their use for an image. URIs can simply be represented by plain User IDs and software can easily detected such URIs if desired. The need to implement UAT only adds more complexity for a questionable purpose. Note that these image UAT were introduced due to marketing needs of PGP or NAT and (iirc) only specified after they had been introduced in their software. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
- [openpgp] Linked Identities / URI Attributes stat… Wiktor Kwapisiewicz
- Re: [openpgp] Linked Identities / URI Attributes … Werner Koch
- Re: [openpgp] Linked Identities / URI Attributes … Vincent Breitmoser
- Re: [openpgp] Linked Identities / URI Attributes … Werner Koch
- Re: [openpgp] Linked Identities / URI Attributes … Wiktor Kwapisiewicz