Re: [openpgp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-01.txt
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sat, 06 February 2021 22:31 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341B83A2CB3 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 14:31:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lUnXYtU4uWHs for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 14:31:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B99203A2CB1 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 14:31:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 182BC389A7 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 17:34:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id hsPr-WTHxobd for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 17:34:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981673899C for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 17:34:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF85585 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 17:31:37 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: openpgp@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <44a9245e-d6af-8919-6d35-3c7672bfa54b@nohats.ca>
References: <161254580617.29620.7114088127291075805@ietfa.amsl.com> <44a9245e-d6af-8919-6d35-3c7672bfa54b@nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 17:31:37 -0500
Message-ID: <31231.1612650697@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/3aG88Sa-pjNfNg0tR0hbJJVmTEI>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-01.txt
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 22:31:43 -0000
looks good to me. Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote: > On Fri, 5 Feb 2021, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: >> Subject: [openpgp] I-D Action: >> draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-01.txt > We just submitted -01 version. You can see the diff here: >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-01 SHA224 | 0x30, 0x31, -> SHA224 | 0x30, 0x2D looks like an errata fix? (Table 5) I looked in gitlab briefly, but I didn't see this change quickly. Otherwise SHA224 is identical to SHA2-256, I think. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
- [openpgp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-r… internet-drafts
- Re: [openpgp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-cryp… Paul Wouters
- Re: [openpgp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-cryp… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [openpgp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-cryp… Heiko Stamer
- Re: [openpgp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-cryp… Michael Richardson
- Re: [openpgp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-cryp… Heiko Schaefer
- Re: [openpgp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-cryp… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [openpgp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-cryp… Paul Wouters
- Re: [openpgp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-cryp… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [openpgp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-cryp… Andrew Gallagher
- Re: [openpgp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-cryp… Andrew Gallagher
- Re: [openpgp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-cryp… Guillem Jover
- [openpgp] whitespace definitions in OpenPGP [was:… Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [openpgp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-cryp… Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [openpgp] whitespace definitions in OpenPGP [… Werner Koch
- Re: [openpgp] whitespace definitions in OpenPGP [… Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [openpgp] whitespace definitions in OpenPGP [… vedaal
- Re: [openpgp] whitespace definitions in OpenPGP Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [openpgp] whitespace definitions in OpenPGP [… Guillem Jover