[openpgp] Re: Primary Key Binding sigs on authentication subkeys

Andrew Gallagher <andrewg@andrewg.com> Wed, 29 January 2025 09:58 UTC

Return-Path: <andrewg@andrewg.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E77FC15198B for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2025 01:58:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=andrewg.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PLOYDzcsFDoH for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2025 01:58:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fum.andrewg.com (fum.andrewg.com [135.181.198.78]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD2B5C15154A for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2025 01:58:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=andrewg.com; s=andrewg-com; t=1738144719; bh=vKjkeLIO3xmc8XZbIHoAtsGED/NgEoqf9JFnucLeBMs=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:From; b=bRrAvN/Hc/+q+zSNbC48z9oGpF0DJbesp6fw+txG/YiZfkf1nY6reWo9KPiIw6u7L ZXSSarEiDqbYW90wTf3V9qjQdZhK/WkRyiZ2+2QseEQjRV9tI85RqAj+nXmWwlSmcC GV+UvCKTuZmdvT1gE2CWFvPjyx6lvxjx0ioGW7Fa1dRGdUUSO0md6yLv02uAtnS87A GSUExIOjrp0OUPMReeOMUDj8x1QhOptY8ZGg6x6GoZ7Tyk9gq2Qh5zI2jAUYdDnC8H NEZYRijdsu73dRSr/hRyBMsmiGwMs5uurseRxk+cN693A7Zz4VKihcSj2msmvyKlAy YJGDtlvr/+zEQ==
Received: from smtpclient.apple (serenity [IPv6:fc93:5820:7349:eda2:99a7::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by fum.andrewg.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD1605DC93; Wed, 29 Jan 2025 09:58:39 +0000 (UTC)
From: Andrew Gallagher <andrewg@andrewg.com>
Message-Id: <F0390A0D-7750-4E44-A846-F279288C85B2@andrewg.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_087BBE8A-E748-459A-A4B8-A56A02FA19A3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6.1.9\))
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 09:58:20 +0000
In-Reply-To: <c7ca0acc7298dcccb4f14d8b81a45b5733a93a1b.camel@verbuecheln.ch>
To: Stephan Verbücheln <stephan=40verbuecheln.ch@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <D6B824E8-5559-41FB-8EC4-ACC0C35FAEB0@andrewg.com> <HBqO7fta_A4PuuS2EkZ4W5g6SAnzgN38ZYjpGWqgZJHCFqCQUNQ-BAXEHRqa7pwGU5jI7s6XpvGV2ZYLpa6se9e-SJDujNO6yknALtzlAW8=@protonmail.com> <875xm64wtk.fsf@europ.lan> <LIWr-Fiz5EpXR5DQtFrZRqWCtNc1_ADJN-d8TrWsw0s9auDsh76eXn6jdo0J1d3WTrWkxNnnSufHRlUcuBqsyxYhnReLn3fPR8ZUR4CPSNc=@protonmail.com> <c7ca0acc7298dcccb4f14d8b81a45b5733a93a1b.camel@verbuecheln.ch>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6.1.9)
Message-ID-Hash: WQY5RPTGC3SBLGRGTYYDQZG6QLMCJQRV
X-Message-ID-Hash: WQY5RPTGC3SBLGRGTYYDQZG6QLMCJQRV
X-MailFrom: andrewg@andrewg.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-openpgp.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: IETF OpenPGP WG <openpgp@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [openpgp] Re: Primary Key Binding sigs on authentication subkeys
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/4QNyI9YA44bCSKWkILh1Z6Ld8UA>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:openpgp-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:openpgp-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:openpgp-leave@ietf.org>

Hi, Stephan.

On 28 Jan 2025, at 22:51, Stephan Verbücheln <stephan=40verbuecheln.ch@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Since you did not even know that PGP auth keys are commonly used for
> SSH, maybe you should slow down instead of pushing forward before
> breaking everything. This again smells like Proton trying to change PGP
> with only their own use case of email in mind, already causing schism
> in the PGP community.


The fact that no one person knows everything about OpenPGP should not be considered a weakness. The reason we have a list like this, open to the public, is so that proposals can be debated in an inclusive forum and modified or rejected before anyone releases any code into the wild. I don’t think it’s constructive to berate individuals for asking questions on this list - we’re trying to encourage people to bring their ideas and questions here early, to ensure that the OpenPGP ecosystem improves over time (and I speak as someone who has had his own half-baked ideas cut down to size by this list on one or two occasions!).

There is a football (soccer) principle that I’ve seen applied to other online communities to great effect: "play the ball, not the man (or woman)". It should be possible to have a robust debate about the technical issues without crossing the line into making personal attacks.

A