Re: [openpgp] saltpack on OpenPGP message format problems

Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> Fri, 12 February 2016 15:52 UTC

Return-Path: <wk@gnupg.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FFEF1A1BF3 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 07:52:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NC7Q_5Go11qS for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 07:52:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kerckhoffs.g10code.com (kerckhoffs.g10code.com [IPv6:2001:aa8:fff1:100::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 688D31A1BEF for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 07:52:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uucp by kerckhoffs.g10code.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) id 1aUG10-0005S6-NL for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 16:52:14 +0100
Received: from wk by vigenere.g10code.de with local (Exim 4.84 #3 (Debian)) id 1aUFwz-00078V-F5; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 16:48:05 +0100
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
To: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
References: <56BB0308.8020504@iang.org> <20160210160641.GA3090@singpolyma-liberty> <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4BED18C@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> <87lh6rbp5n.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de> <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4BEE527@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>
Organisation: g10 Code GmbH
X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text.
OpenPGP: url=https://k.gnupg.net/80615870F5BAD690333686D0F2AD85AC1E42B367
Mail-Followup-To: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>, Stephen Paul Weber <singpolyma@singpolyma.net>, "openpgp\@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>, ianG <iang@iang.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 16:48:05 +0100
In-Reply-To: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4BEE527@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> (Peter Gutmann's message of "Fri, 12 Feb 2016 13:51:11 +0000")
Message-ID: <87d1s27wwa.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/4gau_5VkE1zrp9oMO5IMuJCdhmg>
Cc: Stephen Paul Weber <singpolyma@singpolyma.net>, "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>, ianG <iang@iang.org>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] saltpack on OpenPGP message format problems
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 15:52:22 -0000

On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:51, pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz said:

> I dunno because that's not my area of expertise, but somehow every other
> software mechanism in existence has managed to get by without needing its own
> custom "ASCII armoring" (is there anything other than PGP that does this?), so

X.509 and OpenSSL private key format is basically the same - except for
the armor checksum.  You also need that PEM format to paste a CSR into a
CA's web form.


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.