[openpgp] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-openpgp-02-02: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 05 November 2020 09:49 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietf.org
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3883A0DDF; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 01:49:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke_via_Datatracker?= <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: openpgp-chairs@ietf.org, openpgp@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.21.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke?= <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <160456975729.19433.13353452999589156795@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 01:49:17 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/5mUoPe4ZbxVj2mRTW7UJJ4bacsY>
Subject: [openpgp] =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke=27s_No_Objection_on_charter?= =?utf-8?q?-ietf-openpgp-02-02=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 09:49:18 -0000

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-openpgp-02-02: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


While I support the creation of the WG, I have some comments on the charter:

1) is it necessary to include the first four paragraphs about the history ?

2) the charter insists on 'no delay' but the previous version of the charter is
dated 2015... ;-)

3) is the word 'entertain' the right one in "OpenPGP may be entertained by the
working group" ? For a non-English speaker, the word 'entertain' is about
getting fun but there seems to be other meaning

4) in"the working group will accept no I-D" s/accept/adopt/ ?

5) I do not know about the context, but the last paragraph looks to me like
requesting a WGLC before adoption. Also, it requires two reviews but what will
happen if those two reviews are negative ?