IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] Followup on fingerprints

Vincent Breitmoser <look@my.amazin.horse> Thu, 30 July 2015 16:45 UTC

Return-Path: <look@my.amazin.horse>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3121F1A90ED for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 09:45:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wzdvaty5dJKy for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 09:45:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.mugenguild.com (mugenguild.com [5.135.189.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 100581A9108 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 09:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (gate.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de [134.169.34.1]) by mail.mugenguild.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC8645FCD9; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:41:25 +0200 (CEST)
References: <CAMm+LwgTcn8CY+Zk-f9gzXQtMJezG97T+kx2=C7PR5g7zFer_A@mail.gmail.com> <87twsn2wcz.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de> <CAMm+LwgRJX-SvydmpUAJMmN3yysi4zzGSpO2yY4JAMhD-9xLgQ@mail.gmail.com> <87zj2ecmv8.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> <CAMm+LwgKmcTes=V7uS3MjCQixWCo-i7PY=VE7eCHSqt3Ho3OSg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vincent Breitmoser <look@my.amazin.horse>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
In-reply-to: <CAMm+LwgKmcTes=V7uS3MjCQixWCo-i7PY=VE7eCHSqt3Ho3OSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:45:05 +0200
Message-ID: <87mvyd7fxq.fsf@littlepip.fritz.box>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/6E4dK6A7ZfgLXQoNlPqF2x5tEMA>
Cc: IETF OpenPGP <openpgp@ietf.org>, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Followup on fingerprints
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 16:45:29 -0000

On 30 Jul 2015, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> OK, 'at least the 512 bit fingerprint'...

How are we even back to talking about 512 bit fingerprints?  I'm getting
a feeling we are starting to repeat everything that was discussed in the
original "fingerprints" thread here.


 - V

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email