Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-openpgp-rfc4880bis

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 27 June 2016 19:40 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A3912D0D9 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 12:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.127
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.127 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aQCfrNbu37Ht for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 12:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com [23.79.238.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B988312D0DA for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 12:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28703F401B; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 19:39:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com [172.27.118.250]) by prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB8F3F4005; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 19:39:58 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; s=a1; t=1467056398; bh=0Sy2S6s7R6w7Mw9mrwgZVrUrvH9smB3KiZC9NtUG7Wo=; l=484; h=From:To:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=L58aCH6A2ECy/6sR+YuApZESDgo3rApbMv2mUFZr4d2Co3AvT2BG0Qu2XfmuMJLko aJI4Q/jkBJN+WyL78Kd2ul449akdnhUkwONRjaoSBTRf5bFt+5jwWXCrV61wn0kHQh 2aHpzPDlsACpNSUAGQMVb2VY5C8Ki9KJuyEOccBs=
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-casadmn.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.123.33]) by prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85DB11FC88; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 19:39:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 15:39:58 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1130.005; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 15:39:58 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "Robert J. Hansen" <rjh@sixdemonbag.org>, "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-openpgp-rfc4880bis
Thread-Index: AQHRzvaXj00ZvYzxeUipkq7vFR1qgJ/9gwm4gABIw4CAAA+hgIAAH90A//+9lwA=
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 19:39:57 +0000
Message-ID: <86a9b2b7dd8c438e9215a6633e0813fe@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <878txtjnf6.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> <sjmeg7ivbuu.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <8b0200bf-16a9-76e6-71e7-b2fe445257d2@sumptuouscapital.com> <89ED178E-039B-498A-B201-C9C159A669DD@icloud.com> <381dd7f1-6c74-e4e4-0c24-4dc0c13067bc@sixdemonbag.org>
In-Reply-To: <381dd7f1-6c74-e4e4-0c24-4dc0c13067bc@sixdemonbag.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.115.73]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/80wcAXbPMznjnUPdIgrybzW2U1I>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-openpgp-rfc4880bis
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 19:40:02 -0000

> The presence of an algorithm in the spec tends to create pressure on
> implementations to support that algorithm.  When RFC2440 had reserved
> entries for TIGER192, there was a small but vocal crowd in the GnuPG
> community crying out, "we need TIGER192, it's in the spec!"  And as soon as
> TIGER192 was removed, those voices died out -- because hey, it's no longer
> in the spec.

Separating maintenance of the registry from the spec should address this, right?