Return-Path: <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D12C130DCC
 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed,  7 Nov 2018 17:26:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, 
 DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001, 
 URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (3072-bit key)
 header.d=crustytoothpaste.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 8VWHBWd4-xW6 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Wed,  7 Nov 2018 17:26:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from injection.crustytoothpaste.net (injection.crustytoothpaste.net
 [192.241.140.119])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4F911286E7
 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Wed,  7 Nov 2018 17:26:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from genre.crustytoothpaste.net (unknown
 [IPv6:2001:470:b978:101:941b:b2ff:ecfe:7f28])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by injection.crustytoothpaste.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1EA476077B;
 Thu,  8 Nov 2018 01:26:04 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=crustytoothpaste.net;
 s=default; t=1541640364;
 bh=qCyVMyhaTVi6jumqU52poLRXMNoLHoVOypj+aXhb2HE=;
 h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Content-Type:
 Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Date:To:CC:
 Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:In-Reply-To:References:
 Content-Type:Content-Disposition;
 b=rFkQ995/hDPjNHDuBlmRg+v2sXlza3zk/qMteraFV9o13B0QNmeQgKYJdpPW7Aw2x
 Y6O4mTYOineHPPR9EPGkrDsMrc8XA6ddJSjnOd3Xqk8QIKdwHsxhz3dnhR3hRq/C86
 qQ0wRCgZsA4weda0JaPmIQYJJ3aHbXWvcJYAxd2y7sYcD341CwSEP3BMyekpAS0KOP
 qtjBwzHa7OVECTtCNFiYGYc8729KsG9i0A75Fi/Kk1MmBM6wTDXrPF9i0NtH76xThQ
 gPUcH8IWTtcoIW3DFtwPsQ+jbIKC/4sIAPN1P2u7O8xb3g+opB/LerDQnrQD8ejM6P
 1mKrIRNnNAEKTUhYRnbGmolfc1h59leZ/GMC/LTu7jb8dKvaIeNfff3hWLrdeHTIyz
 kSmW4QYjQGsLKn0m4rqLkD0MxLovp6KdDZEDPtx79yjZQMWujchQldHdb02zFkTui1
 yB1Qvl0JfTsgG7zCDXa3IB+2qFmYpL0mF2Uqoz7Mwe8BG6Wfi7z
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 01:25:59 +0000
From: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
To: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Cc: openpgp@ietf.org, Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
Message-ID: <20181108012559.GF890086@genre.crustytoothpaste.net>
References: <23523.16831.292658.490356@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aPdhxNJGSeOG9wFI"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <23523.16831.292658.490356@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
X-Machine: Running on genre using GNU/Linux on x86_64 (Linux kernel
 4.18.0-2-amd64)
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 127.0.1.1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/8Gi1wLqiUq03iu8f8y1qAYjO_bA>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] OpenPGP Web Key Directory I-D
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>,
 <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>,
 <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 01:26:08 -0000


--aPdhxNJGSeOG9wFI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 07:49:19PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> 4. The lowercasing of the email address is contrary to the Internet
>    mail specifications, where case-sensitivity of the email address
>    is up to the mail domain in question.  If the email address were
>    not obfuscated by hashing it would be easy for the webserver to
>    handle case-sensitivity by URL remapping.

I definitely agree that lowercasing the address is wrong.  The RFCs say
that the local part is case sensitive, and there are many case-sensitive
systems on the Internet today.
--=20
brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204

--aPdhxNJGSeOG9wFI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.2.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=5tNN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--aPdhxNJGSeOG9wFI--

