IETF Logo Mail Archive

[openpgp] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-replacementkey-01.txt

Andrew Gallagher <andrewg@andrewg.com> Sat, 16 November 2024 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <andrewg@andrewg.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E3F4C14F70A for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Nov 2024 10:28:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=andrewg.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XfpGCFMK7Vlq for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Nov 2024 10:28:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fum.andrewg.com (fum.andrewg.com [IPv6:2a01:4f9:c011:23ad::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B988C14F702 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Nov 2024 10:28:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=andrewg.com; s=andrewg-com; t=1731781703; bh=PzpHy2HH0G1GNB1j6DFtOG5DFN1nS9QX6BTHZnfgXiE=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:From; b=mJehH+dxWVq18aLjv5ybrmlTZDMlMoX3pHNQEZ88T/mTc49YF8eVIIFezQSdXazGb plB7ILZRbhdz81YJFWjPeb93hYOOFaXbNfYJKCDy5YqmDxTAyk3bgDvtNGkJAmWAyg OaQtJbac85AnV9E85H29/AAOvvMOz4eyUOuyGiIBAEl9HfuclNph4HCksk9T7i/40x A1SdjT+ra9X7iPauDea+w8KtkXNYXYp+kGZNbPXmTUUUG/625UpgdC58WQK3UiTMiV V+OJSGuWmB2TSQ7buEt43+av/PI4sNQ8qvNw5gY0L2nXrnDuvtpAHb9hXJVwR2nmBl g/C9EkN/ChA6A==
Received: from smtpclient.apple (serenity [IPv6:fc93:5820:7349:eda2:99a7::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by fum.andrewg.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD84A5E68F; Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:28:22 +0000 (UTC)
From: Andrew Gallagher <andrewg@andrewg.com>
Message-Id: <CAF63BC5-9A24-495B-B399-6DC65CFA7A22@andrewg.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DE6E7825-9F79-4284-92CA-5DC8C393ABBE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6.1.2\))
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:27:57 +0000
In-Reply-To: <n5d9S1LMnWcBedf1s81m0ixnQpl2ZLMUnFX2rYCAOQXjSxExz2vnvcZ-mIiZcpr16o4zObieFUyqzhnLiWNAMkZslk_rOGpfdE89RjKZEoE=@protonmail.com>
To: IETF OpenPGP WG <openpgp@ietf.org>
References: <172954607466.2080527.11129941200377024335@dt-datatracker-78dc5ccf94-w8wgc> <B498EDD0-1FE4-405B-81AD-8E4854720B6F@andrewg.com> <F082F1E1-8779-45AA-897B-CDE8DDF95B40@andrewg.com> <tTD49Q9CCd7cUJK2anZkb4NYq2JS5f4Krv0N3IwmyeYOl2sSotwa2uheNT4il9BzhQtx26q7Avlwufd5Zr09t0cOqa-x74MjNdrjNUE6f_o=@protonmail.com> <85D1D96A-EEC1-4C0A-9A6F-E7BF14554567@andrewg.com> <ai21-U0l-5xqlffeNXg9qeRMY6Kp4dv5Hhxe8dYF5DcWPkLI0Ab6KpGs4qnaVvhytkTR9jtgHtS646sdEuU051bS4IXADvOowyteudKHkpA=@protonmail.com> <8AF30CAC-9E83-4629-9100-6F6DCFA4584A@andrewg.com> <n5d9S1LMnWcBedf1s81m0ixnQpl2ZLMUnFX2rYCAOQXjSxExz2vnvcZ-mIiZcpr16o4zObieFUyqzhnLiWNAMkZslk_rOGpfdE89RjKZEoE=@protonmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6.1.2)
Message-ID-Hash: MRKIQGYMKFAZ2GB3YWVWEEHKQED4ENVR
X-Message-ID-Hash: MRKIQGYMKFAZ2GB3YWVWEEHKQED4ENVR
X-MailFrom: andrewg@andrewg.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-openpgp.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Daniel Huigens <d.huigens=40protonmail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [openpgp] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-replacementkey-01.txt
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/BoTi-6Wvh0vTGaRLdg4MvFr3158>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:openpgp-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:openpgp-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:openpgp-leave@ietf.org>

On 15 Nov 2024, at 23:38, Daniel Huigens <d.huigens=40protonmail.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> The reasoning makes sense to me, so I'd agree with dropping the "no
> replacement" bit. Indeed I also don't particularly see a use case for
> explicitly stating the default.

I have an MR here for this change: https://gitlab.com/andrewgdotcom/openpgp-replacementkey/-/merge_requests/15/diffs

A

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status