Return-Path: X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E3F4C14F70A for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2024 10:28:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.107 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=andrewg.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XfpGCFMK7Vlq for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2024 10:28:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from fum.andrewg.com (fum.andrewg.com [IPv6:2a01:4f9:c011:23ad::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B988C14F702 for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2024 10:28:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=andrewg.com; s=andrewg-com; t=1731781703; bh=PzpHy2HH0G1GNB1j6DFtOG5DFN1nS9QX6BTHZnfgXiE=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:From; b=mJehH+dxWVq18aLjv5ybrmlTZDMlMoX3pHNQEZ88T/mTc49YF8eVIIFezQSdXazGb plB7ILZRbhdz81YJFWjPeb93hYOOFaXbNfYJKCDy5YqmDxTAyk3bgDvtNGkJAmWAyg OaQtJbac85AnV9E85H29/AAOvvMOz4eyUOuyGiIBAEl9HfuclNph4HCksk9T7i/40x A1SdjT+ra9X7iPauDea+w8KtkXNYXYp+kGZNbPXmTUUUG/625UpgdC58WQK3UiTMiV V+OJSGuWmB2TSQ7buEt43+av/PI4sNQ8qvNw5gY0L2nXrnDuvtpAHb9hXJVwR2nmBl g/C9EkN/ChA6A== Received: from smtpclient.apple (serenity [IPv6:fc93:5820:7349:eda2:99a7::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by fum.andrewg.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD84A5E68F; Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:28:22 +0000 (UTC) From: Andrew Gallagher Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DE6E7825-9F79-4284-92CA-5DC8C393ABBE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6.1.2\)) Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:27:57 +0000 In-Reply-To: To: IETF OpenPGP WG References: <172954607466.2080527.11129941200377024335@dt-datatracker-78dc5ccf94-w8wgc> <85D1D96A-EEC1-4C0A-9A6F-E7BF14554567@andrewg.com> <8AF30CAC-9E83-4629-9100-6F6DCFA4584A@andrewg.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6.1.2) Message-ID-Hash: MRKIQGYMKFAZ2GB3YWVWEEHKQED4ENVR X-Message-ID-Hash: MRKIQGYMKFAZ2GB3YWVWEEHKQED4ENVR X-MailFrom: andrewg@andrewg.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-openpgp.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: Daniel Huigens X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6 Precedence: list Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5Bopenpgp=5D_Re=3A_I-D_Action=3A_draft-ietf-openpgp-replacementke?= =?utf-8?q?y-01=2Etxt?= List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --Apple-Mail=_DE6E7825-9F79-4284-92CA-5DC8C393ABBE Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3624C4B1-A7BF-4614-BEF3-3F94A1E93000" --Apple-Mail=_3624C4B1-A7BF-4614-BEF3-3F94A1E93000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 15 Nov 2024, at 23:38, Daniel Huigens = wrote: >=20 > The reasoning makes sense to me, so I'd agree with dropping the "no > replacement" bit. Indeed I also don't particularly see a use case for > explicitly stating the default. I have an MR here for this change: = https://gitlab.com/andrewgdotcom/openpgp-replacementkey/-/merge_requests/1= 5/diffs A --Apple-Mail=_3624C4B1-A7BF-4614-BEF3-3F94A1E93000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii On 15 Nov = 2024, at 23:38, Daniel Huigens = <d.huigens=3D40protonmail.com@dmarc.ietf.org> = wrote:

The = reasoning makes sense to me, so I'd agree with dropping the = "no
replacement" bit. Indeed = I also don't particularly see a use case for
explicitly stating the default.


A

= --Apple-Mail=_3624C4B1-A7BF-4614-BEF3-3F94A1E93000-- --Apple-Mail=_DE6E7825-9F79-4284-92CA-5DC8C393ABBE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEKR55odxVrielLu+DXB7EBNWQZikFAmc45C0ACgkQXB7EBNWQ ZinuWA/+LbrUD5VMkNsqkitn4JhzkCPxttN8Fd5Ib76Oav+LSPdOMZ9PU9gvxZjx wFgycG888S9Wlt7dyDJeuWgl96V88keBjTHw67XfBj4qmpjZb7+DgiU4S2R5CQQP syW5MzfiHnnrUrKrZf+UtbzmWKaH2YdY1OQCaqTWv+lgh7S55S2vPS9QyuUX5WBY RRvQrMd28tcgoWiTJaXaLN3PJUFyt4oluEx13JOWz3bZ3US7cQ9VPDZny9rPy+2u YYqazckYPCwlvWIV8IHJXR0A7pltaj5FwgrLd13TOatOO27pGoWrAs6K3mokah7D CQuLtI9mT8uIEs4UK9HBbLoQ3ZVYSyU2zWx2K0BBzNC5E9YC0rpZzJpW7Qv40BpE 6khhT3nLIinCpSCeJg8dGSVaO0CvcWwEwE2GwWA+F6+fppx0E8uZ7MAmZazPuyCC SbNEgAQD5C4CqxG+0qq1QhXE87sQLlwaH1KJCey1MvfWmuOugqQhSozqUaBtiFw+ MyaCpWJt2fJlsUBXGSswE4UQAX/0GpL9oom84/sgu/pDSiLbLAsVDR0F7sluJsgw Si4I73HJ1k/sqLt60XtGQnpC9sjdGIurGpX+fLAtZAOL+zMTjKr17TXaOqC34moa STkxxxlpens+jascks7xkZ9Im0VHVmsRzTTW+lT3S3HlopgyzjA= =JGcO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_DE6E7825-9F79-4284-92CA-5DC8C393ABBE--