IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] saltpack on OpenPGP message format problems

Ben Laurie <ben@links.org> Thu, 11 February 2016 09:19 UTC

Return-Path: <benlaurie@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB5C1ACDA2 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 01:19:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F6Y-AEcXdTCb for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 01:19:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22c.google.com (mail-lb0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 339FB1ACD94 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 01:19:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id cw1so24268155lbb.1 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 01:19:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=XmqAZWMAcT0LJYwZt4pAh3uTAqTAJY4p/NmHqDtg7aA=; b=Tol3+4TElJKigOwEQ/3/egkHg++JnCUAEA5uo+/reRzYxTEmjV8fLA++k1Tx3d9RJo LcxJ6WmP8bJXrqKNtn9zvoRxR2I6Tcj/JcgH8PAVpGTv/1WcBQe9wPx2OCddepjjDSqX 5Abq0MI6cFVlv0Dt5zQ9oX3jHcX6Gjoj1UkQTAUmpqDXuek7vEAz10+UD4LB/dDv50+W uDysDNi0R/L/STcGyFHxeJwEAf0aLwBN+2YdTYkeGg/RLlF33QJevcjusrZiX8zeI/9Z auB8J2djZTfhr1U4bPfi78CCrAFm0ZRzo2pmY7xsSL5FS+AUVcm6AF2kPlVhXyHHf9aw 2eFg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=XmqAZWMAcT0LJYwZt4pAh3uTAqTAJY4p/NmHqDtg7aA=; b=jZhSMrTB791lIIYCWs+asIYIml3/03vDVc3bSqWJzpsXHscOQawIINafJOsX7F41PL 8AV8RUQM5YfuyixBZjquo6levckH18lNv7FNYLDigeTeU8urMYFKXXZGPUylhTiXv9ON NWI3zhZzRj81GpmrFn5cp9mIBWwF1XMBNn0uxXLsw9eBukVLfSC+3ttQoZ1jN9IvY3Pm NqPsIOCwvJ6A/9RQkv3Prv8i6wHxNhJFgWLo0IimrK1xgKVlRcxsgdgOHYQM1pS6iGWb srZK8HoZpkXsfVhRVfzZYdzwn3GzpMdTLg04jO8byAugTIB8skiT2mwlGcXNkDzkjyG2 /06g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTxNJzqip+icRpYsYOHfH/4+SLy4wOltE0Ym3cNpp2Vdsy8hFWHksXJCD5uqOET0yrCUp0+UEZDko3Wog==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.136.136 with SMTP id qa8mr18009465lbb.51.1455182346053; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 01:19:06 -0800 (PST)
Sender: benlaurie@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.148.226 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 01:19:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56BB0308.8020504@iang.org>
References: <56BB0308.8020504@iang.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 09:19:05 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: dPL0Ztn19MF1lCHiDwmAjaUL57k
Message-ID: <CAG5KPzyWq1zqeXCL=Pzi0v=+QAmOycvyFtazQnKxH5r9fn487Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Laurie <ben@links.org>
To: ianG <iang@iang.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e01183116d1f2f9052b7b0ad8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/CIQRA9yUwudLYCPUwrrhfDjN2-k>
Cc: openpgp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [openpgp] saltpack on OpenPGP message format problems
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 09:19:12 -0000

On 10 February 2016 at 09:29, ianG <iang@iang.org> wrote:

> In contrast, NaCl encryption authenticates the sender in a repudiable way.


Really? How? I couldn't find any documentation for that.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email