Re: [openpgp] lack of agenda items...

Hi Stephen,

I think that for me, the main thing that would be useful to discuss is
to what extent, and how, we want to do the following: (from [1])

> *where feasible*, reduce potential conflicts with Werner's draft

I know that that message asks for specific text, and I'd be willing to
propose some, but I'm not entirely sure what direction to go in.

For example, do we want to bump keys and signatures to v6? That would be
a crude but simple way to ensure interoperability. More fine-grained
changes to ensure that crypto-refresh-v5 keys and signatures inter-
operate with draft-koch-v5 keys and signatures would take a lot more
work, which I'd prefer to only do if the WG decides that that's the
best way to go.

So, I would prefer to keep the meeting, so that we can discuss that -
however, if you think that should be discussed on the mailing list
first, that could also work.

Best,
Daniel

[1]: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/yayGaIen3DW6ixwrJkP-QcAcFSQ/

------- Original Message -------
On Wednesday, November 2nd, 2022 at 13:54, Stephen Farrell wrote:

> Hiya,
> 
> So far we've had only one WGLC comment about draft-07.
> I'm seriously wondering if we need a f2f meeting next
> week if that remains the case. I realise it's v. late
> in the day to cancel, but f2f sessions should really
> only be used when needed and likely to be productive.
> 
> Please let us know if you plan to post a review of the
> draft in the next week. If we have some of those we
> can I think have a useful meeting. If not, I think we
> ought to cancel. (Please feel free to disagree with
> that last assertion too though.)
> 
> If we do cancel next week's slot, we'll extend the
> WGLC and organise a virtual interim meeting.
> 
> Thanks,
> S.
> 
> PS: The lack of agenda items is the reason for the
> lack of a posted agenda:-)
> _______________________________________________
> openpgp mailing list
> openpgp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp