Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments

David Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com> Tue, 19 September 2006 23:16 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GPopm-00074h-Mx for openpgp-archive@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:16:58 -0400
Received: from balder-227.proper.com ([192.245.12.227]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GPopl-0005ti-B3 for openpgp-archive@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:16:58 -0400
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k8JMthcx013797; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 15:55:43 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k8JMthfV013796; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 15:55:43 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from foobar.cs.jhu.edu (foobar.cs.jhu.edu [128.220.13.173]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k8JMtf66013789 for <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 15:55:42 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from dshaw@jabberwocky.com)
Received: from walrus.hsd1.ma.comcast.net (walrus.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.60.132.70]) by foobar.cs.jhu.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k8JMtdx28849 for <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:55:40 -0400
Received: from grover.jabberwocky.com (grover.jabberwocky.com [172.24.84.28]) by walrus.hsd1.ma.comcast.net (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k8JMtbl4024435 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:55:37 -0400
Received: from grover.jabberwocky.com (grover.jabberwocky.com [127.0.0.1]) by grover.jabberwocky.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k8JMtXlP000581 for <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:55:33 -0400
Received: (from dshaw@localhost) by grover.jabberwocky.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k8JMtWSL000580 for ietf-openpgp@imc.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:55:32 -0400
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:55:32 -0400
From: David Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com>
To: OpenPGP <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>
Subject: Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments
Message-ID: <20060919225532.GC32656@jabberwocky.com>
Mail-Followup-To: OpenPGP <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>
References: <sjmd59txlnv.fsf@cliodev.pgp.com> <1CF1EBF5-1C5A-4ACE-A489-10ED8D9BD31C@callas.org> <20060919121914.GC30748@jabberwocky.com> <871wq89e1h.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> <20060919144037.GD30748@jabberwocky.com> <45103D0C.3000707@systemics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <45103D0C.3000707@systemics.com>
OpenPGP: id=99242560; url=http://www.jabberwocky.com/david/keys.asc
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12 (2006-08-05)
Sender: owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openpgp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <ietf-openpgp.imc.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906

On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 08:55:08PM +0200, Ian G wrote:

> To my mind, then, it comes down to an optimisation
> problem in determining how to get the doc out the
> door.  Security, common sense, and all that are
> out the window.

I know you're not serious, but if anyone wants to discard "security,
common sense, and all that", then they should really just be silent.

I'm not against a SHA-256 or 512 based MDC.  I'm just noting that this
issue seems to be a misunderstanding between this WG and the ADs, and
it might be nice to know what is going on and ensure we understand
what the objection is before we change the design.

Sam Hartman offered to speak on the phone.  I'd be happy to make that
call, though Jon Callas or Hal Finney would probably be a better
choice.  All I ask for is a 10 minute phone call.  We've already spent
many times that in this discussion.

David