Re: [openpgp] SHA3 algorithm ids.

Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net> Sat, 08 August 2015 23:17 UTC

Return-Path: <calestyo@scientia.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1AFB1A87B0 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 16:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pamJXj6dBQ4T for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 16:17:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw-01.dd24.net (mailgw-01.dd24.net [193.46.215.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A29B1A8726 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 16:17:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailpolicy-01.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net (mailpolicy-02.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net [192.168.1.27]) by mailgw-01.dd24.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE6575FB96 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 23:17:15 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mailpolicy-02.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net
Received: from mailgw-01.dd24.net ([192.168.1.35]) by mailpolicy-01.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net (mailpolicy-02.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net [192.168.1.25]) (amavisd-new, port 10235) with ESMTP id t-NR7Ecwye0z for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 23:17:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from heisenberg.scientia.net (p579DF309.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.157.243.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgw-01.dd24.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 23:17:13 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1439075830.20521.66.camel@scientia.net>
From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>
To: openpgp@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2015 01:17:10 +0200
In-Reply-To: <55C68729.3050603@iang.org>
References: <835832901.20150808225230@gmail.com> <55C68729.3050603@iang.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="sha-512"; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; boundary="=-UcrEuDSmCW66e/ia5xc+"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.3-1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/FoQF16c0ICZUaSMjcaos51PODdw>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] SHA3 algorithm ids.
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 23:17:19 -0000

On Sat, 2015-08-08 at 23:48 +0100, ianG wrote:
> My "position" is only one hash, as many know well.  I prefer the
> longest, because they are computers and they don't have enough work 
> to 
> do.
If only one is to be assigned a number, it should be definitely the
longest.

Cheers,
Chris.