IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] Move new Signatures and Keys from v5 to v6?

Aron Wussler <aron@wussler.it> Tue, 21 February 2023 09:07 UTC

Return-Path: <aron@wussler.it>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E17FC1522A4 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 01:07:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wussler.it
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lvW2uL5jv8Sp for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 01:07:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-4317.proton.ch (mail-4317.proton.ch [185.70.43.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72580C1522AB for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 01:07:19 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 09:07:09 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wussler.it; s=protonmail; t=1676970436; x=1677229636; bh=J6W8DcNXn7iEe311n6er25s9qcsboZBovG6nqs7fChs=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=LxCF5+9jcRIqeEojPiNS7R9lFMKx4d7meeDHgbpZmDIeVlZD23cV03VHyJLKv5EpZ AtZiidusLAFT8iITigGH6ARUTcXpciBuYVo1Ot2R/WyQocMiL984yX8bYuAGLfQIkz NIOfMwekjX3sYqjzbkgZb6b6IprCztdE8V1dQ4cQrR/tWnJGO48xTlCcexWssD0N9b gKR8jO+WWkY+W8sU3cXgbvrDX1iDV2RABq24SNoLriWQ6PrC5pO0uOZ82+93dUM6Bh EvBpWBwS34iOSMe3/mcO9ZFv4z99LmaeEELawnNR0Ax8qtKtbeesQryw2k6w4jqAcy DkIYyGGztpLww==
To: Justus Winter <justus@sequoia-pgp.org>
From: Aron Wussler <aron@wussler.it>
Cc: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>, openpgp@ietf.org
Message-ID: <HS-uXLcC4qFLswlljQ94DpunKfg_6nduzbyd-YbQhX01WG8xbd1EPG1IAYnHBxyuyFa-hu33J-TF6tWSxN2exWzQtrv237h0LQTY1tsUkYs=@wussler.it>
In-Reply-To: <87cz6b9ka3.fsf@europ.lan>
References: <877cwwnige.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <877cwqlqj5.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <87cz6b9ka3.fsf@europ.lan>
Feedback-ID: 10883271:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; boundary="------8c871b1c51f4e0cadae83217045f611f17b3820a8ccf719d18ecee3728cd8a91"; charset="utf-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/Gg6xqZdFojOTFQvCAXBXor7cI1w>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Move new Signatures and Keys from v5 to v6?
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 09:07:26 -0000

> I support the move to v6 keys, signatures, one-pass-signatures, PKESKs
> and SKESKs. I support changing the synthetic header for hashing as
> well.

Same here. It will greatly simplify compatibility with existing and deployed v5 implementations.

Cheers,
Aron



--
Aron Wussler
Sent with ProtonMail, OpenPGP key 0x7E6761563EFE3930



------- Original Message -------
On Wednesday, February 15th, 2023 at 13:37, Justus Winter <justus@sequoia-pgp.org> wrote:


> Daniel Kahn Gillmor dkg@fifthhorseman.net writes:
> 

> > On Sun 2023-02-05 12:13:53 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > 

> > > Question to the WG: should the new key and signature formats change
> > > codepoint designations from v5 to v6?
> > 

> > In the discussion at today's interim, the sense of the participants in
> > the room was that this move is the right thing to do. In addition,
> > the move from 0x9a to 0x9b seemed to be appropriate.
> > 

> > Furthermore, participants encouraged moving the new variants of PKESK and
> > SKESK from v5 to v6 as well for this draft, to make it easier to observe
> > "v6" behavior.
> > 

> > I've agreed to offer an additional MR on top of !231 that handles the
> > PKESK/SKESK move as well, but that's not prepared yet. If someone else
> > wants to offer that specific change and point to it in this thread, i
> > would not object.
> > 

> > Please give feedback about this decision on this thread here, even if
> > it's simple feedback!
> 

> 

> I support the move to v6 keys, signatures, one-pass-signatures, PKESKs
> and SKESKs. I support changing the synthetic header for hashing as
> well.
> 

> Best,
> Justus
> _______________________________________________
> openpgp mailing list
> openpgp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email