IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status

Stephen Paul Weber <singpolyma@singpolyma.net> Tue, 15 August 2017 16:45 UTC

Return-Path: <singpolyma@singpolyma.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7123B132043 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 09:45:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=singpolyma.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xf8-oh8SUOVn for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 09:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from singpolyma.net (singpolyma.net [IPv6:2607:5300:60:9e74:1000::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0756812426E for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 09:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dhcp-108-168-20-134.cable.user.start.ca [108.168.20.134]) by singpolyma.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA7C248607F8; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 16:45:07 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=singpolyma.net; s=iweb; t=1502815507; bh=F0M1Su12Gw8Kq0Dee4t1ssSaHOwDOwxnzp6+cexohdU=; h=Date:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:References:To:Cc:From; b=J+9AAp6ZJWSkq6uTauHSmYM6dMuoLYVwPkj1LIx7yibpRiXRKv4vW5MqXDo7zj6Hi pkPrvpi2eOXPl8+elMJSFPf7d5WI4I2ZQco0KgETNuSTP0jJKoIf8MAM4CMuRs7B2u gg0+Vz10zOP0IqHnImxgiHG6n/+1i7VwzeIcPGYo=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: BlackBerry Email (10.3.3.2205)
Message-ID: <20170815164507.6111315.47595.68549@singpolyma.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 11:45:07 -0500
From: Stephen Paul Weber <singpolyma@singpolyma.net>
In-Reply-To: <20170815131326.wa5guttvgsp2la5g@calamity>
References: <20170712223852.zmnvw4iwvziqsynq@genre.crustytoothpaste.net> <20170810014751.erufvruh2lm5cdpe@genre.crustytoothpaste.net> <1b68dbbb-38ac-6370-fe20-76be795b2634@sixdemonbag.org> <20170811202924.yiwzjom3tag3ivkk@genre.crustytoothpaste.net> <a2f2973f-2b34-5e07-2651-a1910d992c6a@sixdemonbag.org> <sjmefsef9b6.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <3bff215c-4de7-3994-8f78-5a06caa3fbfe@sixdemonbag.org> <20170815131326.wa5guttvgsp2la5g@calamity>
To: Vincent Breitmoser <look@my.amazin.horse>, "Robert J. Hansen" <rjh@sixdemonbag.org>
Cc: openpgp@ietf.org, Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/H8SGVbi7EX7bL7cZHv-owdBaDl0>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 16:45:10 -0000

> Yes, moving away from SHA1 is a good idea. We should do that asap. But I really dislike that this comes with an increased fingerprint size to 256 bits.

Wouldn't anything else require truncation, and thus not give us the extra safety we're looking for?

-- 
singpolyma, not a cryptographer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email