Re: [openpgp] rfc4880bis and draft-openpgp-iana-registry-updates-01

Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com> Mon, 03 December 2018 16:59 UTC

Return-Path: <derek@ihtfp.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49816130E1E for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 08:59:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.99
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.99 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ihtfp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YdroR-zXuEvc for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 08:59:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org (MAIL2.IHTFP.ORG [204.107.200.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80564130E0E for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 08:59:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E03EE2050; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 11:58:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.ihtfp.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26882-06; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 11:58:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from securerf.ihtfp.org (IHTFP-DHCP-158.IHTFP.ORG [192.168.248.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mocana.ihtfp.org", Issuer "IHTFP Consulting Certification Authority" (not verified)) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDEEBE2045; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 11:58:52 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ihtfp.com; s=default; t=1543856332; bh=SVBW7iJwxefPlT+0moBlfX3trCnPXhmENMI6FS38+ao=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=LBalP47rgdXZqJ0QFQZG4wrL3H88j3bFOyPrEsUh1BZMFC6wnu61y5xZtZ/wjhOuU dip/wlZ35ImvogGt3be1lyTsN3XcAT5CkpjGQI2QjkQr0l53vYSIPBPMmFWXTJ3BGB BX7u2En5MrQ8m9oT1X3/5TfbFmeed3KJAMNHrscg=
Received: (from warlord@localhost) by securerf.ihtfp.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id wB3Gwp1Z031827; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 11:58:51 -0500
From: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Cc: Ronald Tse <tse@ribose.com>, "openpgp\@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>, Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>, "Mark D. Baushke" <mdb@juniper.net>
References: <87y3aosju2.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> <B64F4A5B-1894-4B01-9DAE-3C7A19C772BF@ribose.com> <14036.1543342928@contrail-ubm16-mdb.svec1.juniper.net> <B6F2B98A-E960-4189-A579-E29916079904@ribose.com> <875zwhvef3.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> <sjmmuptyszn.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <20181201001941.GE87441@kduck.kaduk.org> <348B9107-4726-4899-A980-FD3BEB2A0BA5@ribose.com> <20181203010151.GG54918@kduck.kaduk.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 11:58:51 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20181203010151.GG54918@kduck.kaduk.org> (Benjamin Kaduk's message of "Sun, 2 Dec 2018 19:01:51 -0600")
Message-ID: <sjmftvey2b8.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.2a
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/IBXwukO6SBE_PVKQ5hdRipypmN0>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] rfc4880bis and draft-openpgp-iana-registry-updates-01
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 16:59:04 -0000

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>; writes:

> Most of the pain of 8447 was on the WG chairs and AD to manually do
> consistency checks.  I don't expect much of an efficiency gain from
> practice, but I suppose there are probably ways to distribute the work that
> we did not explore very well for 8447.

And we don't have a WG chair here.......

> -Ben

-derek
-- 
       Derek Atkins                 617-623-3745
       derek@ihtfp.com             www.ihtfp.com
       Computer and Internet Security Consultant