Re: [openpgp] OpenPGPv4 long keyid collision test cases?

Nicholas Cole <nicholas.cole@gmail.com> Fri, 13 December 2013 18:19 UTC

Return-Path: <nicholas.cole@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F4F1AE6E9 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:19:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SM970xby0Czb for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:19:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD5961AE6E8 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:19:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ee0-f54.google.com with SMTP id e51so878245eek.27 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:18:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=bvhV3+II+ZrX0HkMfsvDhxSWZtspKHJqeCc5/qlRHYQ=; b=VLSZ0wM0paK/MEVOHkezNE8kJ/vJyD/UcDtpo+CX4eNL6JwZkioyzqRw7fMf4YNbhQ BHtb+PwQAJBVN8fiGtar+FIJNnIlMbGoIIOrigrSlL3KXOMlntOEhvXqjpNolQc88DRs y66rNy4PVmdVqsD3tPzbS16SadCf0YKPEbnyzYx3pL1gkNmhkGZrrr03xV1orpgBF4tE jX9wBsTIjWtBQJhRTimrYgkw+oxlGGzh6fL3CfIJ6r7ZzO4Ee6V49qKVuByK7T1EmamJ M2+s81qTCEQpUYDiqYjgMNVg6ayJrSq99x/MvXCDNVAogaKQXWAHHvWeUmcJAnySprQS EUww==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.15.109.205 with SMTP id cf53mr4387443eeb.30.1386958717052; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:18:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.14.115.8 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:18:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1386947394098.1ce462e@Nodemailer>
References: <1386947394098.1ce462e@Nodemailer>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:18:36 +0000
Message-ID: <CAAu18hfipgtcg6+EJvqoX6Bn7apNz=aQ8=8gHjMJqcg6PFUfGw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nicholas Cole <nicholas.cole@gmail.com>
To: David Leon Gil <coruus@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: openpgp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [openpgp] OpenPGPv4 long keyid collision test cases?
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:19:21 -0000

On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:09 PM, David Leon Gil <coruus@gmail.com>; wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> I recently needed a pair of OpenPGPv4 keys that collided on long key id. So
> far as I could tell, there aren't any test-cases around. (Maybe I'm missing
> something somewhere?)

Very interesting.  I can't actually import those keys on GnuPG 2.0.20.
 I get the error "Doesn't match our copy" when I try.

Should you forward your original mail to the gpg developers' list?

N.