Re: [openpgp] Padding packets

Daniel Huigens <d.huigens@protonmail.com> Fri, 17 June 2022 13:22 UTC

Return-Path: <d.huigens@protonmail.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E0FBC14CF01 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 06:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TO_EQ_FM_DIRECT_MX=1, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HTCAUXVUmI1u for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 06:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-4316.protonmail.ch (mail-4316.protonmail.ch [185.70.43.16]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 305A5C15AAFA for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 06:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 13:22:16 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1655472146; x=1655731346; bh=ZkOiz0ze+fyOUIWdGie7prprYSQAuFTw+foUWuQ1jyY=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To: Feedback-ID:Message-ID; b=mbq4+70zmLUDSASnUkV4EQsetWxTvY51S6nOKCrlrsll5O2id2WrUJYqr3KkbDHI3 9zTvL1a25WxpIjbVl8H77vUE/3NlMRyb8q6Mgn3S0aAVp97hz+M8BVBrdHt68ocdnC zNedeYM2nbXjnBy8eF2v3VIjGg8ZfMMA8Yp8Rut8xRNEsalJfXMJofGkNfBkUEYU8q sntfB5WlGr1ixf6xLrZQPrrbdSbCplHPS+k7G95tuzBg+DIJsIhTVlRmi3+2W190sx 5jLYKAsqMtwIrdD/5MlOhQvdmcg+qcP3U4diMH/yD11UhSDsf4Z3oI4O0++K3Iv8Gl yxZu5P1X9eVnA==
To: Daniel Huigens <d.huigens@protonmail.com>
From: Daniel Huigens <d.huigens@protonmail.com>
Cc: "Neal H. Walfield" <neal@walfield.org>, Ángel <angel@16bits.net>, openpgp@ietf.org, "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Reply-To: Daniel Huigens <d.huigens@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <WUay0Jqs4ZMf8nIClMqf2L_JO9-YII26ulNVshM9NFg8p5-6ypkSLZL317bihfHdXuPF9EC10AO_sw7upg6dJNwFGMygy23z6Ky6XECUSkM=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3R01BgeAsIJWAL_DdKQ6fQxJFK_m6Klj9aKJ1COVNvmk0AC_jlizEOjvOH1UwlIIj9ul387szZDi9R5ojN0dlF-v3gK__DtdRCuaDvOv8zs=@protonmail.com>
References: <87wndi88ri.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> <83cce07c67f67c19b06c0c4239b6f335512a9a6f.camel@16bits.net> <o17TAfJTeOZkYp5X-XwNQwnTrCaiKEGnn1ZAL1qLB5CTGKntjwv6dpCIah44pAdH8nHXa4ivte_MMtqXuKP3uhobW5kJk9E6rAEWneD11yA=@protonmail.com> <87k09fh2ga.wl-neal@walfield.org> <3R01BgeAsIJWAL_DdKQ6fQxJFK_m6Klj9aKJ1COVNvmk0AC_jlizEOjvOH1UwlIIj9ul387szZDi9R5ojN0dlF-v3gK__DtdRCuaDvOv8zs=@protonmail.com>
Feedback-ID: 2934448:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/IW0E0C9L3L8hLsPSGCjUjCNInK0>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Padding packets
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 13:22:32 -0000

(Though I guess we could just not verify the contents of the padding
packet in that case, so maybe it's fine.)