IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] Fingerprints and their collisions resistance

Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> Sun, 06 January 2013 12:27 UTC

Return-Path: <wk@gnupg.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B79E21F87A9 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Jan 2013 04:27:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O84tIyTLK0E4 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Jan 2013 04:27:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kerckhoffs.g10code.com (kerckhoffs.g10code.com [217.69.77.222]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A8A21F8750 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Jan 2013 04:27:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uucp by kerckhoffs.g10code.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.72 #1 (Debian)) id 1TrpJx-0005v7-91 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 13:27:21 +0100
Received: from wk by vigenere.g10code.de with local (Exim 4.77 #3 (Debian)) id 1TrpFu-0007Yh-Hr; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 13:23:10 +0100
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
To: Jon Callas <jon@callas.org>
References: <50E530D6.6020609@brainhub.org> <50E5494E.6090905@iang.org> <50E60748.3040103@brainhub.org> <50E60F7A.8000001@fifthhorseman.net> <50E61BF7.4020905@brainhub.org> <50E88141.1030907@iang.org> <87vcbb9qpu.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de> <50E8B59C.4010807@fifthhorseman.net> <A2C78934-AD29-47AF-84D8-A48B0A081D50@callas.org>
Organisation: g10 Code GmbH
X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text.
OpenPGP: id=1E42B367; url=finger:wk@g10code.com
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 13:23:10 +0100
In-Reply-To: <A2C78934-AD29-47AF-84D8-A48B0A081D50@callas.org> (Jon Callas's message of "Sat, 5 Jan 2013 19:19:43 -0800")
Message-ID: <87ip7aa4b5.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: openpgp@ietf.org, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>, ianG <iang@iang.org>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Fingerprints and their collisions resistance
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/openpgp>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 12:27:23 -0000

On Sun,  6 Jan 2013 04:19, jon@callas.org said:

> Also, the point compression patent expired last year.

Oh really.  That would be great news.  No other patents to the same
effect?


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email