IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] likely timeline for WG (re)formation

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Fri, 30 October 2020 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3804C3A0EC3 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 07:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.246
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.246 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0uTuVWW5s27w for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 07:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 071153A0EC1 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 07:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id E295EBE47; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 14:06:43 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AXYNgb0nk3pK; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 14:06:41 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.244.2.119] (95-45-153-252-dynamic.agg2.phb.bdt-fng.eircom.net [95.45.153.252]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AFF96BE2E; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 14:06:41 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1604066801; bh=zEPa+Tp4VMe7W+aFvzHHpWm0A+KwpLjUxzwwQD+lJ9c=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=TIt3B/Ex7kLMPMS+aKhBg9hB/S76aMF2LV1HZN/TYncXWck/zu68of/3GZjocx+LL XNRl+IQfrHmw7yeXDqXezrzGCJ4ygKj9bXgd2rVaPoVh/V1pWcF01WvsC2MG6n2Eox Ai2c9WomqnAa0rJBsc4u7q5KAxXA923601gcKXBg=
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
References: <9d1da3a1-e67b-6c4a-deeb-979486a56f95@cs.tcd.ie> <8199.1604066618@localhost>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Message-ID: <273a7baf-5be0-814c-386b-0f42b4e09abb@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 14:06:40 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8199.1604066618@localhost>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KRJf46tGcWztmYBfb2EamNQFOCxBI5eDK"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/JXCZbLDO88TNHUipJj24Ml-QfNA>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] likely timeline for WG (re)formation
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 14:06:48 -0000

Hiya,

On 30/10/2020 14:03, Michael Richardson wrote:
> 
> Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
>      > - given that timeline is not long (compared to the age
>      > of 4880 say:-), I'd encourage people to hold fire 'till
>      > that's done and we should be able to get going as an
>      > "official" WG in the not-too-distant (starting in on
>      > it all in detail now risks having to re-do stuff in
>      > a month or so, so probably isn't worthwhile I'd say)
> 
> In the meantime, if we plan on having virtual interims (I hope so) to time
> box ML discussion, then I suggest that we might want to doodle-poll,
> (or that other tool you prefer) for a consistent time-of-the-week in which to
> do the virtual interims.
> 
> If we are going monthly, which week.

That's a good point. I'll chat with DKG and see what
he thinks. Meanwhile, any thoughts/preferences about
whether and how to schedule virtual interim meetings
(aka phone calls;-) welcome.

Thanks,
S.


> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>             Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openpgp mailing list
> openpgp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email