IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc4880bis-01.txt

Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> Mon, 02 January 2017 10:03 UTC

Return-Path: <wk@gnupg.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E991295BE for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 02:03:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xo_qO2HRrXH8 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 02:03:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kerckhoffs.g10code.com (kerckhoffs.g10code.com [IPv6:2001:aa8:fff1:100::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78E761295BC for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 02:03:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uucp by kerckhoffs.g10code.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.84_2 #1 (Debian)) id 1cNzSO-0007H8-0Q for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Jan 2017 11:03:08 +0100
Received: from wk by wheatstone.g10code.de with local (Exim 4.84 #3 (Debian)) id 1cNzN6-0001pt-JM for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Jan 2017 10:57:40 +0100
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
To: openpgp@ietf.org
References: <148335040919.21889.5575808321236729044.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Organisation: The GnuPG Project
X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text.
OpenPGP: url=https://k.gnupg.net/80615870F5BAD690333686D0F2AD85AC1E42B367
Mail-Followup-To: openpgp@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2017 10:57:40 +0100
In-Reply-To: <148335040919.21889.5575808321236729044.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> (internet-drafts@ietf.org's message of "Mon, 02 Jan 2017 01:46:49 -0800")
Message-ID: <87wpedeqcr.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=advisors_Ft._Knox_freedom_ISEC_MILSATCOM_Exon_Shell_investigation=Er"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/KlmafaxngTXJPE9v_HKESI_xYy8>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc4880bis-01.txt
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2017 10:03:11 -0000

Hi!

The previous draft was about to expire and thus I published an update.
The only new thing is the Issuer Fingerprint signature subpacket.


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email