Re: [openpgp] chairs for chartering process

[Werner Koch <[e-mail]>]

On Wed,  6 May 2015 20:12, [e-mail] said:

> Working Groups have a tendency to continue to exist past their
> "use-by" date.  As they do, the quality and velocity of their output
> tends to decline.  There are some counterexamples, but, unfortunately,

I understand.

> more expansive, we can propose that for a charter, but the larger the
> charter, the more "convincing" we need to do, especially if the
> technology is mature like PGP is.

I am fine with 

>>> 1) The primary charter goal would be create a RFC4880bis document.
>>>  a) At the end of that process, we would either re-charter, or close.

this.


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.