Re: [openpgp] Overhauling User IDs / Standardizing User Attributes (was: Re: Scoped trust (signatures))

Jon Callas <joncallas@icloud.com> Thu, 28 June 2018 01:44 UTC

Return-Path: <joncallas@icloud.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BC73127332 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 18:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=icloud.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wWk4iVu6qHUU for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 18:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from st13p27im-asmtp003.me.com (st13p27im-asmtp003.me.com [17.162.190.112]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75A56130E7B for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 18:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from process-dkim-sign-daemon.st13p27im-asmtp003.me.com by st13p27im-asmtp003.me.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.1.2.20170607 64bit (built Jun 7 2017)) id <0PB001000F9M8C00@st13p27im-asmtp003.me.com> for openpgp@ietf.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 01:44:42 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=icloud.com; s=04042017; t=1530150282; bh=Jj9/pFnL80VSH3O2r8y+vMhi/c2bz2ZfMINKM41Vxbw=; h=Content-type:MIME-version:Subject:From:Date:Message-id:To; b=DxTqvHIfkmYo0r/hkMiDqEbKPo9GSShV5AOZCLxG81NAkpeQEYOUBUFrQahRV7Nhb H0wWmW7bwCweZKIi013yOZRMxLpm2n7TPz6W+bWur0oqt1zFyVzH5PWXDXk1z2BChd UUJu+0BAWJ3CToVYtDgZSv/dB1vrc+lv3eqp/aV4I3zvpaEC+iw6nOrTM2DW/P7mjV DNkA1UJdDsR0S3vDHPuc4cwDkQGnuCwMSI7E0waRzkU5K7M8NedyHUymnPQ0e1OhgO TL1uqQtOxWGp2rq/5evvFh+oX2oQL6dJe83umtr2KcV1HXgbjA8TxNano7oVO/onYF SBH2DP7wd7uIw==
Received: from icloud.com ([127.0.0.1]) by st13p27im-asmtp003.me.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.1.2.20170607 64bit (built Jun 7 2017)) with ESMTPSA id <0PB00122WFIFWZ00@st13p27im-asmtp003.me.com>; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 01:44:42 +0000 (GMT)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2018-06-27_08:,, signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1806280015
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.4 \(3445.8.2\))
From: Jon Callas <joncallas@icloud.com>
In-reply-to: <3996841a-b6ae-8769-2de8-b35351c54719@leo.gaspard.ninja>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 18:44:39 -0700
Cc: Jon Callas <joncallas@icloud.com>, openpgp@ietf.org
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Message-id: <8E4410C7-9370-492C-838F-857983CA67FC@icloud.com>
References: <39e598e1-2bc0-32c9-3489-4bb6ca2a631b@leo.gaspard.ninja> <871sdw24yd.wl-neal@walfield.org> <c2e6bbe7-0694-8193-bb76-dd50fde7d967@leo.gaspard.ninja> <d28d8f8b-b261-eb29-97bc-9c7159a62ce6@leo.gaspard.ninja> <118e5b9d-de9e-aa14-d8b4-19ef259f3d0a@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> <e63924fe-95b2-dcf8-5726-b0497945ac74@leo.gaspard.ninja> <f31349e2-e509-4e06-6db5-2ff0ffb213a5@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> <3996841a-b6ae-8769-2de8-b35351c54719@leo.gaspard.ninja>
To: Leo Gaspard <ietf=40leo.gaspard.ninja@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.8.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/MFA410yb63pEK_JoWc60aUHQXPA>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Overhauling User IDs / Standardizing User Attributes (was: Re: Scoped trust (signatures))
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 01:44:45 -0000

Forgive me, Leo, but I don’t understand what problem you’re trying to solve, but I’m going to say that’s my fault. Nonetheless, could you reiterate for those of us who weren’t paying proper attention before?

UserIDs are intentionally a huge hand wave. It’s an arbitrary UTF-8 field. Put whatever you want into it. Yes, by convention it’s an email address, but even at the time that that was common it was convention only. When I was with PGP Corporation, we made software signing keys that merely said they were software signing keys, as well as other keys that had no email address, but a text description of what they were.

There’s no reason you can’t put whatever you want in some other sub-packet or what.

	Jon