IETF Logo Mail Archive

[openpgp] Re: Call for adoption of draft-gallagher-openpgp-replacementkey

Andrew Gallagher <andrewg@andrewg.com> Tue, 02 July 2024 12:52 UTC

Return-Path: <andrewg@andrewg.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D77C16941B for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=andrewg.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J-rEpxmTHhlx for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fum.andrewg.com (fum.andrewg.com [135.181.198.78]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7858C1654EF for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=andrewg.com; s=andrewg-com; t=1719924734; bh=FRRT9p5GrFmcGchh6QlgfnphkQ0Y8AMDkZLTO4o0nKA=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To:From; b=bXYVAcgNgZ1g9SUZU5nM+HgH9n2Y+0hCdrtuhBeWqjeKXwRx6zKJYskrVXec3hmyb ThyG9fjogC2XXJmVwUxxG55zo+nM6J314mgAsgSg9pDOXe+uliuS1QzO8p5w/w6HqW oTCvcvP1CDyG/yyo9DhUWjPzPuCRWwHppxdWZcqQheaEaK3AiB8TNOs6cKVxcymWBv oEr7blNilqb5cnBkqT7aaiuYt+xV5thEnFEoMF8QqE4YFFHpmWA31BK4WfBycOsaq/ GZhlQdEYhPo/jg8x+ckOF70G8oReKFWCKG58ZCXNvxX3Cnh0nHN1wtk3ZOyR+q7DaP 4lgdWOfyZEvfw==
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [176.61.115.103]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by fum.andrewg.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7DA0F5DCA4; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 12:52:14 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Andrew Gallagher <andrewg@andrewg.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 13:52:03 +0100
Message-Id: <6E8119B2-CEE8-48DE-9A9D-0ACA6BF81F0D@andrewg.com>
References: <0c2e284b-bee0-45f3-8b9f-8fa7196debbf@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <0c2e284b-bee0-45f3-8b9f-8fa7196debbf@cs.tcd.ie>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (21F90)
Message-ID-Hash: SENZGDGLSQMHUIHZV3GDXG55MOWIV6MF
X-Message-ID-Hash: SENZGDGLSQMHUIHZV3GDXG55MOWIV6MF
X-MailFrom: andrewg@andrewg.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-openpgp.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>, openpgp@ietf.org, Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [openpgp] Re: Call for adoption of draft-gallagher-openpgp-replacementkey
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/NsQ_aJh_OrxGlVseo0yvISk26O8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:openpgp-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:openpgp-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:openpgp-leave@ietf.org>

On 2 Jul 2024, at 13:25, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> 
> So, I'd suggest we:
> 
> - just adopt the draft now, if Simon/others are ok to confirm
> that the changes in [1] mean they're now ok with adoption, or,
> 
> - discuss this topic more at IETF-120, with the goal of
> trying to better understand what else is required for WG
> adoption

Hi, Stephen. 

There was significant discussion about this draft at the openpgp email summit last month, and several enhancements were proposed to address the issues raised re key/trust equivalency. I hope to have an updated draft published asap. 

Re IETF-120, I’m afraid I’ll be on holiday that week and unable to attend (even remotely) so if we could make a decision about adoption on the list instead, that would be *great* ;-)

Thanks,
A

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status