IETF Logo Mail Archive

[openpgp] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-openpgp-pqc [was: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-pqc-08.txt]

andrewg <andrewg@andrewg.com> Tue, 15 April 2025 17:38 UTC

Return-Path: <andrewg@andrewg.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: openpgp@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9611E1C6961B for <openpgp@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 10:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=andrewg.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t6xWqqFTLIDC for <openpgp@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 10:38:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fum.andrewg.com (fum.andrewg.com [135.181.198.78]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52FDC1C695B1 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 10:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=andrewg.com; s=andrewg-com; t=1744738720; bh=dBkBsi/VhgJjg9dD6TSXqGYFhnxpi0rlOOonB/Apw0g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=GxhgKR2z0hDdR73Hsow3X2kuS9oXTX29o7ckRWVH3e4vwWYqTIfdhbFMfVDndAGQQ H0/bkVdXgu991lXjIw4wx2mIafS66cwMS/oezrBnP+ddqw6sNAL0qXb55omseK4gFj 1/Uq8NnDi26H8mjNd5Dnp3n8DTFFYHvqVxIoPRMwUIgHyl0uOQV2/JSzNnfeRSL8Jl mN9pEwlJdQYfnF5UxOZ2TbbjtW2TyLce0/+ssulosuC4Ls30vaINpkPnr5ZuZifqa6 PvUfRXgbAi4SRi06xWbr9FBosOyP7W5ttb5Ci8wCuklMY5D/KUmJ62i+mJFtzMMVoX wJ2FjTpOOvJgA==
Received: from mail.andrewg.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fum.andrewg.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B83C25DE60; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:38:40 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:38:40 +0100
From: andrewg <andrewg@andrewg.com>
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
In-Reply-To: <87wmblcr8i.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
References: <174470653269.1286532.14892820163225351018@dt-datatracker-64c5c9b5f9-hz6qg> <LSicuu3DyGQdz5FlANti-HGJ6GuAucc5BKufbsCa603EsSZ0q1XMXYvt_OubLd0UQkg0gh2F--9y9WpoqWfQu5XU-KEcJ15GG66cSFk9ByU=@wussler.it> <87wmblcr8i.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
Message-ID: <3a61ec8bb0b13302b7ce6609cf5b4574@andrewg.com>
X-Sender: andrewg@andrewg.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID-Hash: D3H6BEN2RX6LNENXMSLXDHTLGCKKEBET
X-Message-ID-Hash: D3H6BEN2RX6LNENXMSLXDHTLGCKKEBET
X-MailFrom: andrewg@andrewg.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-openpgp.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [openpgp] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-openpgp-pqc [was: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-openpgp-pqc-08.txt]
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/OaHJKVOiKjU7iWrOxIG7IxsGqRo>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:openpgp-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:openpgp-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:openpgp-leave@ietf.org>

On 2025-04-15 17:41, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> 
> With these changes, Stephen and I are announcing Working Group Last 
> Call
> on draft-ietf-openpgp-pqc.
...
> Even if you aren't implementing, if you have concerns or questions 
> about
> it, please also speak up.

Hi Daniel, list.

I am happy with the latest draft, which addresses my outstanding 
concerns about backwards compatibility. Overall I believe this draft has 
been thoroughly scrutinised and debated, and I will be pleased to see it 
progress through WGLC.

Thanks to all the authors for their hard work!

A

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status