IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] WG Review: Open Specification for Pretty Good Privacy (openpgp)

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sat, 28 November 2020 06:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750333A097E; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 22:05:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vO7jeae2tKjL; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 22:05:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 295A03A097B; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 22:05:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88040389F5; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 01:06:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id qLZNzjJXcM7m; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 01:06:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45C1389CE; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 01:06:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1BD8F; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 01:05:09 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
cc: "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <7C0C4B04-A0F5-49A4-8EAB-81402EA6BE18@akamai.com>
References: <160643436808.11589.17889575697881704601@ietfa.amsl.com> <7C0C4B04-A0F5-49A4-8EAB-81402EA6BE18@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 01:05:09 -0500
Message-ID: <2574.1606543509@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/P0c-sfw1kMzLVNssDA-rNUV2GG8>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] WG Review: Open Specification for Pretty Good Privacy (openpgp)
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 06:05:15 -0000

Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
    > What is different that folks think it will succeed this time?

It's unclear to me what "it" refers to, or "this time".

It could be the WG, it could be the protocol, it could be that email will be
become ubiquitously encrypted/signed.

Stephen seems to have answered with "it == WG", but it's not clear to me that
you mean that.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email