[openpgp] Should we try to meet in Yokohama?
Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Thu, 17 September 2015 15:46 UTC
Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34DF61ACE64 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 08:46:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GXj24-HRYmAy for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 08:46:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [209.234.253.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCB01ACE37 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 08:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fifthhorseman.net (ool-6c3a0662.static.optonline.net [108.58.6.98]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 96462F984 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:46:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EE9661FF4D; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:46:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
To: IETF OpenPGP <openpgp@ietf.org>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:46:39 -0400
Message-ID: <87twqt121s.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/Ptz7NULEPmruCq9cktdzcirkPYY>
Subject: [openpgp] Should we try to meet in Yokohama?
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 15:46:57 -0000
IETF-94 is coming up in November [0]. If we want an in-person meeting there, we need to ask for it by tomorrow. Are enough OpenPGP WG participants planning to attend that it makes sense to schedule an in-person meeting, or should we stick to the list for this round? Feel free to mail me off-list if you have plans to be in yokohama but don't want to advertise them on-list. I'm currently still unclear on whether i'll make it to the meeting myself. The mailing list has been mostly silent this past month (possibly due to people being offline for the summer?) I plan to poke people about their committments from IETF-93 shortly to try to get things in action again, but if you want to follow up here without my poking you directly, that would also be fine :) So: does anyone think we need an in-person meeting in Yokohama? --dkg [0] https://www.ietf.org/meeting/94/index.html
- [openpgp] Should we try to meet in Yokohama? Daniel Kahn Gillmor