Re: [openpgp] List of "semantic" changes between 4880 and bis
Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> Sat, 03 October 2020 18:25 UTC
Return-Path: <wk@gnupg.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED66C3A09FB for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Oct 2020 11:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gnupg.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id te3IJhVZxC29 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Oct 2020 11:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kerckhoffs.g10code.com (kerckhoffs.g10code.com [IPv6:2001:aa8:fff1:100::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 576173A09FF for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Oct 2020 11:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnupg.org; s=20181017; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=jBzB8uljAp3TvvyFNSYPYGUZUyK7OP0GAhJWC1UQu6Y=; b=FqUJ7V7WOB0o8w92fedPxGNSBN qJLv7Pyb19laRdwzRii2B5fWZPPRRBR9EoLgIGS3SXZJZ76aEdJx1UWRnxCA5yxQFH0p1IYi+s0FK M/tlEq9EyVz/m9f6PUAmdGX4jHbCGqJcX/K9tWZPmR2DSBsqUs2QT4cBm8bN/uj0QHSE=;
Received: from uucp by kerckhoffs.g10code.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.89 #1 (Debian)) id 1kOmDV-0002yo-Dl for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sat, 03 Oct 2020 20:25:09 +0200
Received: from wk by wheatstone.g10code.de with local (Exim 4.92 #5 (Debian)) id 1kOm9N-0005QK-8E; Sat, 03 Oct 2020 20:20:53 +0200
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
To: Wiktor Kwapisiewicz <wiktor=40metacode.biz@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <f96533af-a205-05dd-2f03-f8321dde427a@metacode.biz> (Wiktor Kwapisiewicz's message of "Fri, 2 Oct 2020 15:37:44 +0200")
References: <f96533af-a205-05dd-2f03-f8321dde427a@metacode.biz>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Organisation: GnuPG e.V.
X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text.
Mail-Followup-To: Wiktor Kwapisiewicz <wiktor=40metacode.biz@dmarc.ietf.org>, "openpgp\@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2020 20:20:53 +0200
Message-ID: <87v9frgohm.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/PuWT1daSiJjA9P04fKNDyo-hQe8>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] List of "semantic" changes between 4880 and bis
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2020 18:25:14 -0000
On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 15:37, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz said: >> A piece is an atom possibly followed by '*', '+', or '?'. > > bis: > >> A piece is an atom possibly followed by '_', '+', or '?'. Good catch. That seems to be a bug introduced with the change to the new Ruby tool. In the soruce it is correct: A piece is an atom possibly followed by '*', '+', or '?'. An atom followed by '*' matches a sequence of 0 or more matches of the Has anyone more experience with that new tool? Shalom-Salam, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
- [openpgp] List of "semantic" changes between 4880… Wiktor Kwapisiewicz
- Re: [openpgp] List of "semantic" changes between … Werner Koch
- Re: [openpgp] List of "semantic" changes between … Daniel Kahn Gillmor