Re: [openpgp] Expiration impending: <draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc4880bis-01.txt> Mon, 03 July 2017 19:41 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EDE112ECC1 for <>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 12:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d_SLh1JwbZbD for <>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 12:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a03:4000:6:30bc::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4735813171F for <>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 12:41:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:8e0:1084:de02:e9f8:f772:64a7:84e0] (unknown [IPv6:2001:8e0:1084:de02:e9f8:f772:64a7:84e0]) by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 09244FFC67 for <>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 21:41:33 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;; s=mail; t=1499110893; bh=BpMGL5DxOO5JAGHcIwsUr1WNjodfAorXwGO05b7ow90=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; z=Subject:=20Re:=20[openpgp]=20Expiration=20impending:=0D=0A=20<dra ft-ietf-openpgp-rfc4880bis-01.txt>||Referenc es:=20<149847732613.7086.8580563657011849337.idtracker@ietfa.amsl. com>=0D=0A=20<CALaySJKxWevOZYv1hOBFV-+3T=3D2x43vmie50t6ko2A+a-gTS_>=0D=0A=20<a3a82aab-a0d9-f044-21c0-26de346bf6b3@si>=0D=0A=20<20170702232541.t25v6mf36qnrxkex@genre.crus>=0D=0A=20<1b5da7bf-d43b-fde5-f6b6-28d9c6fd6edb@gm>=0D=0A=20<94a05934-4b5c-4fb6-d127-beb0eacb47cf@sixdemonbag.o rg>=0D=0A=20<679411c5b2de4c308cbfbb3733c4fe54@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.>||Date:=20Mon,=203= 20Jul=202017=2021:41:36=20+0200|In-Reply-To:=20<679411c5b2de4c308c>; b=Qz5ILstk3bd1IVtwCpazFOpKaFLOZpNSLyK34HsPsp6uH74N6rdjRV2PjERXwNYB5 zeYMK8U/3/dn3RT9fvp0bkV8hM0MdiL6ulaKaBGF25zmiv/S+nrNOLRCrhL2WTiYs8 QtCAPef4+hq00FmEzYrIWqKmv+oPC8WoaIoEsxmw=
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 21:41:36 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: de-CH
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Expiration impending: <draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc4880bis-01.txt>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 19:42:37 -0000

Dear List,

May I kindly ask if part of the critcal an necessary changes is
sunsetting 3DES, SHA1.
Yes I know they are still good but I think in current operation speed of
standards it is definitly time to start it.

I expierence in private an buisness live extra efforts to ensure pgp
communication is not using 3DES for example which
costs percious time in our projects.

best regards


On 03.07.2017 21:35, Salz, Rich wrote:
>>> What's your opinion about defining additional (non-ECC) public-key
>>> algorithms, e.g., Cramer-Shoup or an IND-CPA secure variant of ElGamal?
>> I would be opposed to this.  This is not the time to start adding neat stuff to
>> the RFC.  Now is the time to make the critical and necessary changes to the
>> RFC and *get it published*.
> Strongly agree.
> _______________________________________________
> openpgp mailing list