Re: [openpgp] Backwards compatibility

Wiktor Kwapisiewicz <wiktor@metacode.biz> Wed, 25 October 2023 11:21 UTC

Return-Path: <wiktor@metacode.biz>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC33DC151070 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 04:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=metacode.biz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3YYye0fBtWpG for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 04:21:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-171.mta1.migadu.com (out-171.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.171]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5D81C14CE52 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 04:21:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <347ad1a6-3108-4842-b635-9e2683884b51@metacode.biz>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=metacode.biz; s=key1; t=1698232858; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZluiLVcV5s0Sws+eRLMuJ1N14lzpPsIE52ZCXa84Ldg=; b=TqcwgfmFKur3MjvXHoonYuDNi1e7PwidUvfJQdjQDLZgla7KxcvIjTpmZzhJFBZbQAXwb0 cf8WfPgxNKPj4cLfL/qVYdwD4RnAjuv4Xc12F8JP4SuotpoYVUzKth4yvO/OU4ndWVpqeL XlCbpD54KGCyDqJWgNpDOI1fThYdKV0=
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 13:20:55 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Cc: IETF OpenPGP WG <openpgp@ietf.org>
References: <CBAF59DC-8F4E-4E1B-979B-6838D4F662E0@nohats.ca> <87jzrjx3jc.fsf@jacob.g10code.de> <774b9eea-1d06-c957-dc21-4457989c896d@nohats.ca> <87r0lrulsw.fsf@jacob.g10code.de> <999A1C80-4DF7-4E6D-BBCC-B17E4A9C60F8@andrewg.com> <87il72vfgz.fsf@jacob.g10code.de> <SY4PR01MB62510E0FC5A6306A861AD0E0EEDEA@SY4PR01MB6251.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Language: en-US, pl-PL
X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers.
From: Wiktor Kwapisiewicz <wiktor@metacode.biz>
Organization: Metacode
In-Reply-To: <SY4PR01MB62510E0FC5A6306A861AD0E0EEDEA@SY4PR01MB6251.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/QVl5J3J0mjgxASPzx7FBrbX6_Sw>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Backwards compatibility
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 11:21:07 -0000

On 25.10.2023 13:09, Peter Gutmann wrote:
> I think a bit more detail would help here, namely mentioning the fact 
> that GCM fails catastrophically if an IV is ever repeated.

What's your opinion on the AES-GCM-SIV variant, Peter?

Kind regards,
Wiktor