Re: [openpgp] [PATCH] Updated S2K

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Fri, 12 April 2019 16:13 UTC

Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 11:13:45 -0500
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Nils Durner <ndurner=40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, openpgp@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20190412161344.GB97741@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <CAOyHO0zz3PdWpsX=7mcT370WSmR_Cn7Er19zQ8P056XFa-3y9Q@mail.gmail.com> <875zrnn23u.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <875zrnn23u.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/QmpxGZhoB79-3Tc_x9bejXG5VjA>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] [PATCH] Updated S2K
Precedence: list

On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 08:07:17AM +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Mon,  8 Apr 2019 22:14, ndurner=40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org said:
> 
> > +      <reference anchor='Argon2i'
> > +     target='https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-irtf-cfrg-argon2-04'>
> 
> This is not a useful reference:
> 
>    It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
>    material or to cite them other than as "work in progress.

With all due respect, that CFRG document is likely to get published well
before 4880bis, and it is entirely normal for I-Ds to cite other related
I-Ds.  Dependency chains and avoidance of referring normatively to "works
in progress" is handled as part of the normal operation of the RFC Editor
function.

So I must disagree with the statement that this is "not a useful
reference".

-Ben

[openpgp] [PATCH] Updated S2K Nils Durner
Re: [openpgp] [PATCH] Updated S2K Werner Koch
Re: [openpgp] [PATCH] Updated S2K Peter Gutmann
Re: [openpgp] [PATCH] Updated S2K Nils Durner
Re: [openpgp] [PATCH] Updated S2K Marcus Brinkmann
Re: [openpgp] [PATCH] Updated S2K Benjamin Kaduk