Return-Path: <glind98@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
 with ESMTP id 7661411E810D for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:15:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iZffaHyM-QpA for
 <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:15:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vb0-f44.google.com (mail-vb0-f44.google.com
 [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D75F711E80F6 for
 <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:15:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vbbez10 with SMTP id ez10so5396854vbb.31 for <openpgp@ietf.org>;
 Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:15:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=R6/BI1YPr7wejY02bFbJD7fe+dqcljJv4218ZVaZ3RI=;
 b=n7fr4x5ZLGHLHtXU4BBBktGw0xQ86Lrkuaqk9fBy4gnQ5EmFMxRh9/Nxe9Vkj195YX
 F0dHSyy1Zp/AydZO7/89HUaKR7iNSxmf7cysffwSPNAYpJPmvA0cOBtlGYsrUappc/Kj
 u+ZPq8S7EP6tIh8qqjLd0moNYwdjl7J3Kk7xPo7hWh2B/72PPeONBn6N+pws7RuJZKlR
 H9UwLCvrrFxMyXKyZIPk6Ifb5LTRcUN9PQVKyyHr7UvCAciLZz4E9bPXJHlL+Cl+BOMS
 fkrOpgkIeKdYhOHaGykL+wdUcRPIBubXsrABIKZXOmzEivrN7m2mD1YsLNbF6hkYOmIp Zurg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.99.138 with SMTP id eq10mr10783723vdb.25.1343679311353;
 Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:15:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.23.165 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:15:11 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:15:11 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOfLfKxJ-1=zk_Fdk8vzWCbGRB0yNrFOfgWvxA4B3Wn16yi+cQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: George Lind <glind98@gmail.com>
To: openpgp@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3071cc4a0b991f04c611b8db
Subject: [openpgp] calculating PGP signature on a public key
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>,
 <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/openpgp>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>,
 <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 20:15:12 -0000

--20cf3071cc4a0b991f04c611b8db
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I am trying to figure out from the RFC exactly which fields get hashed when
calculating the public key signature.

The public key including the packet header and body
The user id including the packet header and body
signature version
signature type
public key algorithm
hashing algorithm
length of the hashed subpackets
all the hashed subpackets

Can anyone confirm if these are correct?

--20cf3071cc4a0b991f04c611b8db
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I am trying to figure out from the RFC exactly which fields get hashed when=
 calculating the public key signature.<div><br></div><div>The public key in=
cluding the packet header and body</div><div>The user id including the pack=
et header and body=A0</div>
<div>signature version</div><div>signature type</div><div>public key algori=
thm</div><div>hashing algorithm</div><div>length of the hashed subpackets</=
div><div>all the hashed subpackets</div><div><br></div><div>Can anyone conf=
irm if these are correct?</div>

--20cf3071cc4a0b991f04c611b8db--