Re: Comments on ECC draft

David Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com> Mon, 23 September 2002 23:06 UTC

Received: from above.proper.com (mail.proper.com [208.184.76.45]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA28845 for <openpgp-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 19:06:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) id g8NMvRe17550 for ietf-openpgp-bks; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 15:57:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from claude.kendall.corp.akamai.com (fw01.cmbrmaks.akamai.com [80.67.64.10]) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g8NMvQv17546 for <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 15:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from dshaw@localhost) by claude.kendall.corp.akamai.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8NMvIe25702 for ietf-openpgp@imc.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:57:18 -0400
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:57:18 -0400
From: David Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com>
To: ietf-openpgp@imc.org
Subject: Re: Comments on ECC draft
Message-ID: <20020923225718.GA25692@akamai.com>
Mail-Followup-To: ietf-openpgp@imc.org
References: <200109060128.SAA02959@finney.org> <Pine.LNX.4.30.QNWS.0209231456200.32694-100000@thetis.deor.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.QNWS.0209231456200.32694-100000@thetis.deor.org>
X-PGP-Key: 99242560 / 7D92 FD31 3AB6 F373 4CC5 9CA1 DB69 8D71 9924 2560
X-URL: http://www.jabberwocky.com/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
Sender: owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openpgp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <ietf-openpgp.imc.org>

On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 03:01:12PM -0700, Len Sassaman wrote:
> 
> I'd like to bring this up again before the next revision of the draft. How
> close are we to consensus on the ECC semantics?
> 
> OpenSSL now has ECC in it, and there is an ECC in TLS draft being proposed
> in the IETF. It is worth nailing this down, I think.

I'm not against ECC in OpenPGP, but given how close 2440bis is to last
call, perhaps the ECC specification could go in a companion RFC?

David

-- 
   David Shaw  |  dshaw@jabberwocky.com  |  WWW http://www.jabberwocky.com/
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
   "There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
      We don't believe this to be a coincidence." - Jeremy S. Anderson