IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-openpgp-rfc4880bis

Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com> Mon, 27 June 2016 16:25 UTC

Return-Path: <derek@ihtfp.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D529112D7B5 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ihtfp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2WCeMevZfLeL for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org (MAIL2.IHTFP.ORG [204.107.200.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1899312D7BB for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F189E2043; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 12:24:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.ihtfp.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21035-05; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 12:24:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from securerf.ihtfp.org (IHTFP-DHCP-159.IHTFP.ORG [192.168.248.159]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mocana.ihtfp.org", Issuer "IHTFP Consulting Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CBE6E2042; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 12:24:27 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ihtfp.com; s=default; t=1467044667; bh=seZaucDxfo/1JnehnYW+F4KYn1NmePvQ3BJZxg7EKgQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=qyAsWedPOCJc3fcvdeDE1O/auC96fmZpEs5fBGeeTl/jY5mvBlESf8JFXvuLzLFj7 l5ij3hO1AbnkRZkfX4RmFYkYb6roW9CigTgbYY+F4bd1luRkZSGErrJv5v4vpbqdYk FlxwvBECUQnlzS1JdNenH6Z7VBa73DH0NnPywRj0=
Received: (from warlord@localhost) by securerf.ihtfp.org (8.15.2/8.14.8/Submit) id u5RGOQbK032297; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 12:24:26 -0400
From: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
References: <878txtjnf6.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 12:24:25 -0400
In-Reply-To: <878txtjnf6.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> (Daniel Kahn Gillmor's message of "Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:30:53 -0400")
Message-ID: <sjmeg7ivbuu.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.2a
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/S6vcT7qg7_CHhbqZGjnPo5YSnZs>
Cc: IETF OpenPGP <openpgp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-openpgp-rfc4880bis
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 16:25:06 -0000

Hi,

I'm in favor of accepting this.

I'll also point out that I had made another suggested update on April 14
(Subject: Proposed Patch to RFC4880bis to reserve two public key
numbers) which has not been incorporated into the document.

-derek

Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> writes:

> hey OpenPGP folks--
>
> We've had a slow start on 4880bis, but i'm hoping we can get things
> moving again.  One of the things we need to do bureaucratically is to
> officially adopt a specific draft as the basis of our ongoing work.
>
> Werner Koch has prepared and submitted the beginnings of the new
> revision of RFC 4880, the current version of which you can see here:
>
>    https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-koch-openpgp-rfc4880bis-02
>
> This is a call for adoption of this draft by the OpenPGP WG.  Please
> speak up soon if you have any concerns, or if you think this document
> should not be adopted by the WG for some reason.  Please also speak up
> if you are in favor of adoption.
>
> A brief reminder of what adoption by the WG would mean:
>
>  * this draft would become the *starting point* for RFC 4880bis; the
>    draft is currently not complete, but it would be the basis upon which
>    the group would build the new proposal.
>
>  * Werner Koch would be the document editor, but the decisions about the
>    draft would be made by the working group.  I want to thank Werner for
>    his willingness to put in his time as the document editor.
>
>  * Since our charter (https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/openpgp/charter/)
>    is aimed primarily at making a revision to RFC 4880, we would
>    hopefully focus our efforts on contributing review and amendments to
>    this draft, with a goal of driving it to IETF Last Call within the
>    year.
>
> Please give feedback on draft adoption!
>
>    --dkg
> _______________________________________________
> openpgp mailing list
> openpgp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp

-- 
       Derek Atkins                 617-623-3745
       derek@ihtfp.com             www.ihtfp.com
       Computer and Internet Security Consultant

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status