Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status

"Robert J. Hansen" <rjh@sixdemonbag.org> Tue, 15 August 2017 13:58 UTC

Return-Path: <rjh@sixdemonbag.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2DCE132625 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 06:58:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id So2wBWeUHtdH for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 06:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net (shards.monkeyblade.net [184.105.139.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BEFA1321D8 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 06:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from quorra.local (ip72-219-200-232.dc.dc.cox.net [72.219.200.232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: rjh-sixdemonbag) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDA141212E6AD for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 06:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
To: openpgp@ietf.org
References: <20170712223852.zmnvw4iwvziqsynq@genre.crustytoothpaste.net> <20170810014751.erufvruh2lm5cdpe@genre.crustytoothpaste.net> <1b68dbbb-38ac-6370-fe20-76be795b2634@sixdemonbag.org> <20170811202924.yiwzjom3tag3ivkk@genre.crustytoothpaste.net> <a2f2973f-2b34-5e07-2651-a1910d992c6a@sixdemonbag.org> <sjmefsef9b6.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <3bff215c-4de7-3994-8f78-5a06caa3fbfe@sixdemonbag.org> <20170815131326.wa5guttvgsp2la5g@calamity>
From: "Robert J. Hansen" <rjh@sixdemonbag.org>
Message-ID: <06892643-2e48-6c99-2aed-0bb45e74e803@sixdemonbag.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 09:58:32 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170815131326.wa5guttvgsp2la5g@calamity>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Tue, 15 Aug 2017 06:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/S_pTm2xVjmYDm7pDyrAIZwsykS4>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 13:58:36 -0000

> I'm conflicted about this.

I understand there are downsides to it; however, we're facing an
imminent deadline.  The question isn't whether it's perfect; the
question is whether it's good enough.

I don't want to sound as if I'm trying to pressure you into saying yes
to this -- if you think this is a bad idea, I really hope you'll say so!
 But we *do* need to make a choice.

So -- yes or no?