Re: [openpgp] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-12: (with COMMENT)

Justus Winter <justus@sequoia-pgp.org> Wed, 13 December 2023 12:11 UTC

Return-Path: <justus@sequoia-pgp.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D131C14F5E5 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:11:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=sequoia-pgp.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4d7zxNdi5qJ8 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:11:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from harrington.uberspace.de (harrington.uberspace.de [185.26.156.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60253C14F5EF for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:11:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 4386 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2023 12:04:40 -0000
Authentication-Results: harrington.uberspace.de; auth=pass (plain)
Received: from unknown (HELO unkown) (::1) by harrington.uberspace.de (Haraka/3.0.1) with ESMTPSA; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 13:04:40 +0100
From: Justus Winter <justus@sequoia-pgp.org>
To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh@ietf.org, openpgp-chairs@ietf.org, openpgp@ietf.org, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie
In-Reply-To: <170246154806.35325.17958083880636656421@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <170246154806.35325.17958083880636656421@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 13:04:39 +0100
Message-ID: <8734w6cnqg.fsf@europ.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Rspamd-Bar: -----
X-Rspamd-Report: BAYES_HAM(-2.87479) SIGNED_PGP(-2) MIME_GOOD(-0.2)
X-Rspamd-Score: -5.07479
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sequoia-pgp.org; s=uberspace; h=from; bh=YD6yIZ0bpHunSGvgV4HvInOInInrXA9TsBnjViPrPKw=; b=GRPXRTqi4q3GaGwXi6TQuQXVcENYkCk7ttLaACQVQPSmL+e4AQ3K/mt+RTN2wAk+uLD5kQS8ci 5+n++muDsVbOx8E5YLA/+xhDWTGMYoQpvmFSwbVHnQx49p89x6SDE8GjM50hVw4QeKpJ69hpuVfx 8yMnYmdfNfC38R8mc/nbyIF6m0XSbWnTnx3kDUS0iYg/nw78tO9F3v7mM3W/PKUIfR5pRiY5hEd5 GPZDJ4znDOPfZL/xNDNbTMbt+5oHMvKWBwzkb+pHqfYM/fqze8gOqdu1K9fRs5KweQcf10QSgn/a 43DwQpK3GD/b2HhXnXBYk8FAjN8XvLB4leJA6Aal1j4MpMpN3Wx5PVZ+cgjJ45RBojuDxbkOt2dG iHnwyN/jBK0e78Pvm+cL4cWjknMBcdB7b7Sjm8t/NOPQBhxs+PtpbspZW3+6iROggDdq1O14RqVm g0JL6FY7KOUEZC9m/HutA3jvOPnbqKb4xWRuU6e96X/tuTLvFNdyiZZ1yQnr6CzOZK5K9qY35qV+ 1quptZ6EwcBnQdEtiq6v7jZdMHcf9y1m47If51GDu6w6leU0hshav+xDzu3ff5TkLH/kBdewqMBT dLH/zTLd52WiLyz/uUK8+LOLSnWLxrh4RXhl7XsTmdXvSyQChQqH6QgIsw/uIPX3qOlp9HDWMAhe I=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/SujiT3KYEldOa5RF7w0To8QgVKQ>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:11:28 -0000

Hi Éric :)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> writes:

> ## Section 3.5
>
> Should another time epoch be specified ? Using the 1970 Unix epoch will cause a
> problem in 2038, a not too distant future. Why didn't this revised OpenPGP
> propose alternative epoch ?

Note that we measure time using a four octet unsigned integer, so this
will wrap around in the year 2106.  We did not change the time data type
because we tried to focus our efforts on what was chartered, and the
time data type was deemed fine for now.

Best,
Justus