Re: [openpgp] OpenPGP certificate structure: multiple binding signatures on subkeys? (MR 43)

Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Fri, 21 May 2021 22:13 UTC

Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BFEE3A229D for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 May 2021 15:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b=af9MLiUJ; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b=4X1+HGdQ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xYzfEf9K7KLX for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 May 2021 15:13:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [IPv6:2001:470:1:116::7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BE093A229A for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 May 2021 15:13:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019; t=1621635221; h=from : to : cc : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=MDqgAQ7IueSWKwcqw8CcR0aACmO1qS2iVKzW0iW2tq4=; b=af9MLiUJumBqnSerWHatWb/cakeUDdnMrVqjh7L0u7jVwj03sF6aiddkCwscNfqqxj+SA CkW3iZ8pnI/yEnLCQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019rsa; t=1621635221; h=from : to : cc : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=MDqgAQ7IueSWKwcqw8CcR0aACmO1qS2iVKzW0iW2tq4=; b=4X1+HGdQmW8EQP5I13H3NG/HCNE7A1xjCFiQH1RSt9S8+LvKZncuBGhSqcOVXJc0IR2P8 ggZIFNH9KOSbVXvDh2X1drcuepuEGYM51dVVP3Fr65t1kY5RTbqWf2McjPKJLrWuYuWUwCk BB+RnMrZbvYqFBhv/MZzIyvDecvuEssVqIHtCWyKNevH5bv9UcB5MCMYExMFWG034lHyCvW f8K4WXjVyhye2UYeBdGxq5eDDEnGO2Q5Wlphp8juQ6Z3S/G/TBNpBJ93TbJApamPsz03usI MknJVrmVOb7hCxSxzBy5hGsPLXGQ6M1bpYFmLpMsK3x284ctU4I/JEdDGqCw==
Received: from fifthhorseman.net (lair.fifthhorseman.net [108.58.6.98]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D8E7F9A6; Fri, 21 May 2021 18:13:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CCB582040E; Fri, 21 May 2021 18:05:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
To: Paul Schaub <vanitasvitae@fsfe.org>
Cc: openpgp@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <076a1bac-b6c5-4975-8c24-e5c90ffbd5be@fsfe.org>
References: <87bl94dmov.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <076a1bac-b6c5-4975-8c24-e5c90ffbd5be@fsfe.org>
Autocrypt: addr=dkg@fifthhorseman.net; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEX+i03xYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdACA4xvL/xI5dHedcnkfViyq84doe8zFRid9jW7CC9XBiI0QQf FgoAgwWCX+i03wWJBZ+mAAMLCQcJEOCS6zpcoQ26RxQAAAAAAB4AIHNhbHRAbm90YXRpb25zLnNl cXVvaWEtcGdwLm9yZ/tr8E9NA10HvcAVlSxnox6z62KXCInWjZaiBIlgX6O5AxUKCAKbAQIeARYh BMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AADZHQD/Zx9nc3N2kj13AUsKMr/7zekBtgfSIGB3hRCU74Su G44A/34Yp6IAkndewLxb1WdRSokycnaCVyrk0nb4imeAYyoPtBc8ZGtnQGZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4u bmV0PojRBBMWCgCDBYJf6LTfBYkFn6YAAwsJBwkQ4JLrOlyhDbpHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3Rh dGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3JnL0Gwxvypz2tu1IPG+yu1zPjkiZwpscsitwrVvzN3bbADFQoI ApsBAh4BFiEEwp+KDAHzXjTYFqpc4JLrOlyhDboAAPkXAP0Z29z7jW+YzLzPTQML4EQLMbkHOfU4 +s+ki81Czt0WqgD/SJ8RyrqDCtEP8+E4ZSR01ysKqh+MUAsTaJlzZjehiQ24MwRf6LTfFgkrBgEE AdpHDwEBB0DkKHOW2kmqfAK461+acQ49gc2Z6VoXMChRqobGP0ubb4kBiAQYFgoBOgWCX+i03wWJ BZ+mAAkQ4JLrOlyhDbpHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3RhdGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3Jnfvo+ nHoxDwaLaJD8XZuXiaqBNZtIGXIypF1udBBRoc0CmwICHgG+oAQZFgoAbwWCX+i03wkQPp1xc3He VlxHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3RhdGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3JnaheiqE7Pfi3Atb3GGTw+ jFcBGOaobgzEJrhEuFpXREEWIQQttUkcnfDcj0MoY88+nXFzcd5WXAAAvrsBAIJ5sBg8Udocv25N stN/zWOiYpnjjvOjVMLH4fV3pWE1AP9T6hzHz7hRnAA8d01vqoxOlQ3O6cb/kFYAjqx3oMXSBhYh BMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AADX7gD/b83VObe14xrNP8xcltRrBZF5OE1rQSPkMNy+eWpk eCwA/1hxiS8ZxL5/elNjXiWuHXEvUGnRoVj745Vl48sZPVYMuDgEX+i03xIKKwYBBAGXVQEFAQEH QIGex1WZbH6xhUBve5mblScGYU+Y8QJOomXH+rr5tMsMAwEICYjJBBgWCgB7BYJf6LTfBYkFn6YA CRDgkus6XKENukcUAAAAAAAeACBzYWx0QG5vdGF0aW9ucy5zZXF1b2lhLXBncC5vcmcEAx9vTD3b J0SXkhvcRcCr6uIDJwic3KFKxkH1m4QW0QKbDAIeARYhBMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AAAX mwD8CWmukxwskU82RZLMk5fm1wCgMB5z8dA50KLw3rgsCykBAKg1w/Y7XpBS3SlXEegIg1K1e6dR fRxL7Z37WZXoH8AH
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 18:05:35 -0400
Message-ID: <8735ufeo9c.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/TeaQ1_uqhwDFMThj9JraRa8pkng>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] OpenPGP certificate structure: multiple binding signatures on subkeys? (MR 43)
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 22:13:49 -0000

On Fri 2021-05-21 18:14:12 +0000, Paul Schaub wrote:
> Hey list!
>
> 21.05.2021 19:25:19 Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>et>:
>
>> I note that if the change in the structure is correct, then the text
>> below it should also be changed (it should not say "has a single
>> signature after it…")
>
> Good catch, shall I update the PR accordingly?

Yes, it'd be good to have the MR present a coherent change for folks to
consider.  Maybe rebase it against master while you're at it?

Thanks,

       --dkg