Re: [openpgp] Proposal for a separable ring signature scheme compatible with RSA, DSA, and ECDSA keys

Ben Laurie <ben@links.org> Sat, 15 March 2014 09:54 UTC

Return-Path: <benlaurie@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E3A41A00CB for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 02:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AczyCkpvzR1M for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 02:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x234.google.com (mail-qc0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803AB1A00D1 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 02:54:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id x3so3980272qcv.25 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 02:54:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=O/E/LgePrmYHh1turkRgcj7xHemow4UdgSD3hg5OVVA=; b=P/eAIYaw5Fh9R7qd9hnflVyRdx0LrXEpUHqidAqjJwzvcsM3nyT84J5/8OThFCX1e1 LFr1orN/EwxM0Kcs4B7YQkbfInYRFbUcb6YPHUkKzYywlFzxxqfk8ZMrcQQ66vHCsnlJ AsieNeMu+LArEccQ5V6XxeulWieKMHYQ+PQlvy37jFieTPZhh6H2PW9k6jRTIza6Mhvb FNr4zNaaNF8PeFNuFVNPuRxUi7XvOO0iCu/ew2LC5QYN4kKoMekB3gcWWIKqFmNWW1GB 0fRAeSp3lE8E0iGGvFoHAvhHMClnCfIkTqnp9IuUy8Ijf+Mlu0fJ3mnGSpnazjfRei9S z9Fw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.167.19 with SMTP id o19mr15470138qay.77.1394877285204; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 02:54:45 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: benlaurie@gmail.com
Received: by 10.96.157.137 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 02:54:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87lhwcy93w.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de>
References: <80674820640dbeb5ae81f81c67d87541@smtp.hushmail.com> <8761nh1549.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de> <a6d56e791a2c878f34369abc6f09b71d@smtp.hushmail.com> <87y50cybh3.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de> <53233BD4.4020804@fifthhorseman.net> <87lhwcy93w.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 09:54:45 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: uG1IdWgCsDxqndD6tsQAioixpbI
Message-ID: <CAG5KPzxa=HR9LZ6UfnZhMqUmrEF28stmpHi2psAH0amewf-5Cg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Laurie <ben@links.org>
To: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/TjCehdsGIFATLuzyGtPK5bK2P7I
Cc: openpgp@ietf.org, Vincent Yu <v@v-yu.com>, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Proposal for a separable ring signature scheme compatible with RSA, DSA, and ECDSA keys
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 09:54:55 -0000

On 14 March 2014 17:37, Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 18:26, dkg@fifthhorseman.net said:
>
>> I'm not sure i agree with this line of reasoning.  older keys can be
>> imported into newer software (i've done that multiple times).  if the
>
> It is all about probability.

So if I want to deny that I'm the one that made a ring signature, I
make sure I only use the new s/w for ring signatures. Then probability
says its not me, according to you.