Re: [openpgp] User ID Attribute Subpacket

"Derek Atkins" <derek@ihtfp.com> Thu, 21 February 2019 15:22 UTC

Return-Path: <derek@ihtfp.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733DC130DE3 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 07:22:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.689
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.689 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=ihtfp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nG08riIBRGPX for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 07:22:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org (MAIL2.IHTFP.ORG [204.107.200.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A60D91279E6 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 07:22:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D09DE2044; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 10:22:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.ihtfp.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13927-10; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 10:22:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 95ABCE2045; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 10:22:29 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ihtfp.com; s=default; t=1550762549; bh=GnKYFeDoFRTvyt5VsZDPR1oAQcb/8mWdGywsZSTnphk=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Date:Subject:From:To:Cc; b=bIHwH8Qgy8ZzNpjBk0w3Ho45zpZLHcGiHMJ60wZYvLYRYniF/BO7pOSxJ4XCMcTBo SumYrpJORmi/46TrJ9fB/Q9pxdSUx1/TSH2oXYdVajSbNB+4F8dHAuBhsXk9IJA2YM OqFTtO1F27wKeG0UjIU+1txSxiMMHF5pt6jN5KkE=
Received: from 99.46.190.172 (SquirrelMail authenticated user warlord) by mail2.ihtfp.org with HTTP; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 10:22:29 -0500
Message-ID: <080f25061d197cf222f7b47786c04fe7.squirrel@mail2.ihtfp.org>
In-Reply-To: <cfe00f47-c299-293c-f14e-3a6073af7692@metacode.biz>
References: <CA+t5QVsS871zG30dhW_GZ9ALq8bDASD-D3p0YQp9iGJEXUddmA@mail.gmail.com> <d34d0310-2851-dc4b-b5b3-79c7ec530e73@metacode.biz> <CA+t5QVsTATuw4pRhEdMOogh3YA237Rd2zOzzX3B3tZL04tfE0w@mail.gmail.com> <d7bf74c8-8415-da7a-4bf9-5bd455fb657e@metacode.biz> <sjmwolu30jc.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <ba6a5323-965f-d468-5e02-3d1d0cd669d0@metacode.biz> <1741f774aa08d0df4a3ca481339bb733.squirrel@mail2.ihtfp.org> <cfe00f47-c299-293c-f14e-3a6073af7692@metacode.biz>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 10:22:29 -0500
From: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
To: Wiktor Kwapisiewicz <wiktor=40metacode.biz@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>, openpgp@ietf.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22-14.fc20
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.2a
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/Tvvkzk_id8EwbYMCu-0n7t4vrx8>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] User ID Attribute Subpacket
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 15:22:37 -0000

Hi,

On Thu, February 21, 2019 9:46 am, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz wrote:
> Hi Derek,
>
> On 21.02.2019 15:40, Derek Atkins wrote:
>> This is exactly it -- we are storing a certificate on an NFC (or even
>> UHF
>> RFID) chip that would be presented to a verifier -- and then the chip
>> would perform a key exchange using the key in the certificate for a
>> proof-of-possession authentication.  Every byte matters, which is
>> exactly
>> why we went with OpenPGP and not X509!
>
> Sounds interesting, too bad it's not public, I'd gladly check out the
> implementation details :)

I will see what I can do about that.  But no promises.  :-)

> Thanks for taking the time to describe it all!

You're welcome.  Thanks for listening :)

> Kind regards,
> Wiktor

-derek
-- 
       Derek Atkins                 617-623-3745
       derek@ihtfp.com             www.ihtfp.com
       Computer and Internet Security Consultant