Re: [openpgp] Signer's User ID

"Neal H. Walfield" <neal@walfield.org> Thu, 15 September 2016 10:24 UTC

Return-Path: <neal@walfield.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D2F12B231 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 03:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3BnNgF5witNJ for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 03:24:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.dasr.de (mail.dasr.de [217.69.77.164]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCCC912B138 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 03:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p50813126.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([80.129.49.38] helo=grit.huenfield.org.walfield.org) by mail.dasr.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <neal@walfield.org>) id 1bkTqf-0003hr-Q7; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 10:24:53 +0000
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 12:24:55 +0200
Message-ID: <87lgytmpe0.wl-neal@walfield.org>
From: "Neal H. Walfield" <neal@walfield.org>
To: Thijs van Dijk <schnabbel@inurbanus.nl>
In-Reply-To: <CADGaDpHDJ_N6D_wktboD2a-9hq15UKYq=yMPr4jmdin6t7r9FA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87mvj9mrs9.wl-neal@walfield.org> <CADGaDpHDJ_N6D_wktboD2a-9hq15UKYq=yMPr4jmdin6t7r9FA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/24.5 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/UwcDuDuywn_UhQdS47reQkvaqGQ>
Cc: IETF OpenPGP <openpgp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Signer's User ID
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 10:24:59 -0000

On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 12:23:55 +0200,
Thijs van Dijk wrote:
> Good catch. I think being explicit about the expected contents of this
> packet also makes the next sentence redundant (the one that prohibits
> embedding a UAT).

Good point.

:) Neal