Re: [openpgp] AEAD Chunk Size

Jon Callas <joncallas@icloud.com> Fri, 29 March 2019 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <joncallas@icloud.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD7112032A for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 13:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, KHOP_DYNAMIC=0.85, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=icloud.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ro9pEAgSNwiW for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 13:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mr85p00im-zteg06011501.me.com (mr85p00im-zteg06011501.me.com [17.58.23.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FC3812034F for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 13:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=icloud.com; s=04042017; t=1553891954; bh=rzBQlrKvpervuKs+3H6uvkmLdMFQ2Z/yeN7p9oWfMH8=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date:Message-Id:To; b=XRgtIaojbJ4V05oZVdNxNIf5s9FSrVyoZcpTJQsj1j7R066Clx0R1pJ/u7MqY3kGX lWJkYRi1SXsCSxwWDpJRAPKAwEqzzRiygsJzOi37xHFcAiRTEN9KoGTGV2NBP2nK56 A69PgjpZNeRJikUTnvcbS69JpR6l5g9cDO0cKQB1rG8IFwIREJDLxjuN/lH8AoTpYX cGA4uI+y1Ble8+8Uccucsgzyw7p78Y7WSx6Z7njUshDqGViLVrF07Z8DBE2qy8Mp+U egYJ/Rf3S7pt0MamghLu7mpO551sYMiFRWShR4MBPxjc9RrjZDMs5AMebuHotkvvse EIEkAu8U7AUsA==
Received: from [192.168.7.69] (thing1.merrymeet.com [173.164.244.99]) by mr85p00im-zteg06011501.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A1A392A00DE; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 20:39:14 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
From: Jon Callas <joncallas@icloud.com>
In-Reply-To: <fa9de3b0-7270-c6b0-6643-8692bc1a432e@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 13:39:13 -0700
Cc: Jon Callas <joncallas@icloud.com>, openpgp@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E21498F1-CE88-4294-B74E-45E3C2FD3FBD@icloud.com>
References: <87mumh33nc.wl-neal@walfield.org> <878swzp4fb.fsf@europa.jade-hamburg.de> <E65F6E9D-8B0B-466D-936B-E8852F26E1FF@icloud.com> <8736n63bav.wl-neal@walfield.org> <DD6BD098-A048-4513-BAAC-913BF52CDB1D@icloud.com> <fa9de3b0-7270-c6b0-6643-8692bc1a432e@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
To: Marcus Brinkmann <marcus.brinkmann=40ruhr-uni-bochum.de@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-03-29_12:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=647 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1812120000 definitions=main-1903290142
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/VYULKghvsOvXs-Isauvx2cR-cMM>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] AEAD Chunk Size
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 20:39:18 -0000


> On Mar 29, 2019, at 2:52 AM, Marcus Brinkmann <marcus.brinkmann=40ruhr-uni-bochum.de@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Just to set the record straight: I made two very specific actionable
> proposal on this very list 9 months ago.

Yes, you did, and really, that’s the one that I think we’ve been debating from.

Summarizing, you said max chunk size of 64K.

There has been a lot of quibbling from there, like the Protonmail people saying 256K, and others wanting some other things.

Your proposal was the starting point from the one I kicked out yesterday.

	Jon