Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
 with ESMTP id 0FC3921F8445 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Sat,  5 Jan 2013 15:22:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vsrmJzAht+W9 for
 <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat,  5 Jan 2013 15:22:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [209.234.253.108]) by
 ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1BE21F8444 for <openpgp@ietf.org>;
 Sat,  5 Jan 2013 15:22:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.42.104] (h-67-101-156-50.nycmny83.dynamic.covad.net
 [67.101.156.50]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3169FF970;
 Sat,  5 Jan 2013 18:22:09 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <50E8B59C.4010807@fifthhorseman.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 18:22:04 -0500
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Icedove/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
References: <50E530D6.6020609@brainhub.org> <50E5494E.6090905@iang.org>
 <50E60748.3040103@brainhub.org> <50E60F7A.8000001@fifthhorseman.net>
 <50E61BF7.4020905@brainhub.org> <50E88141.1030907@iang.org>
 <87vcbb9qpu.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de>
In-Reply-To: <87vcbb9qpu.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="----enig2OBKWOHLBFKMLBHWAKMSN"
Cc: openpgp@ietf.org, ianG <iang@iang.org>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Fingerprints and their collisions resistance
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>,
 <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/openpgp>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>,
 <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 23:22:13 -0000

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
------enig2OBKWOHLBFKMLBHWAKMSN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 01/05/2013 06:04 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Sat,  5 Jan 2013 20:38, iang@iang.org said:
>=20
>> Fingerprints aren't really for the wire, and if you use them for the
>> wire, you're exercising your right to develop your own security model
>> and threat model.  For my money - don't do that.
>=20
> The fingerprint is used for an revocation key (5.2.3.15).  However, you=
r
> policy may simply disallow the use of a revocation key if this is a
> threat to you.

iirc, there was a rough consensus within this working group that this
was probably a mistake in RFC 4880, and any future revision of the draft
should place the full key material into the revocation key subpacket
instead of the key's fingerprint.

	--dkg


------enig2OBKWOHLBFKMLBHWAKMSN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=gKaK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------enig2OBKWOHLBFKMLBHWAKMSN--
